Valorization of Sugarcane Bagasse for Hydrogen-Rich Gas Production using Thermodynamic Modeling Approach

Authors

  • S. I. Mustapha Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Ilorin
  • I. A. Mohammed
  • F. A. Aderibigbe
  • T. L. Adewoye
  • F. O. Omoarukhe
  • A. O. Sowole

Keywords:

Hydrothermal gasification, thermodynamic modeling, Aspen plus, Hydrogen gas, Sugarcane bagasse

Abstract

Hydrothermal gasification also known as supercritical water gasification (SCWG) has been considered a promising approach for converting wet biomass such as sugarcane bagasse into high-quality syngas. This study presents the thermodynamic modeling of the hydrothermal gasification of sugarcane bagasse using Aspen Plus. The effects of process parameters on the composition and yield of product gases were also investigated. It was found that the effect of temperature and biomass concentration were significant in the production of hydrogen-rich gas, while less impact was observed with pressure. The hydrogen gas (H2) produced with the highest mole fraction (56.70 mol%) and yield (103.26 kmol/kg) was obtained at 750 °C and low biomass concentration of 10 wt%, while the lowest yield (1.52 kmol/kg) and mole fraction (2.45 mol%) of H2 were obtained at 450 °C and high biomass concentration of 50 wt%. Findings from this study also showed that the highest net calorific value (17.55MJ/kg) was reached at 450˚C and 50 wt% of biomass concentration. This study will help to consolidate research on hydrothermal gasification of sugarcane bagasse and optimization of experimental processes. This study would also serve as an important benchmark in the utilization of biomass as a clean energy source for future projects.

References

Adar, E.; M. Ince and M. S. Bilgili. (2020). Supercritical water gasification of sewage sludge by continuous flow tubular reactor: A pilot scale study. Chemical Engineering Journal, 391: 123499

Ahmad, A. A.; N. A. Zawawi; F. H. Kasim; A. Inayat and A. Khasri. (2016). Assessing the gasification performance of biomass: A review on biomass gasification process conditions, optimization and economic evaluation. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 53: 1333-1347.

Caney, S. (2015). Climate change The Routledge handbook of global ethics (pp. 384-398): Routledge.

Cao, W.; L. Guo; X. Yan; D. Zhang and X. Yao. (2018). Assessment of sugarcane bagasse gasification in supercritical water for hydrogen production. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 43(30): 13711-13719.

Chen, W. H.; B. J. Lin; M. Y. Huang and J. S. Chang. (2015). Thermochemical conversion of microalgal biomass into biofuels: A review. Bioresource technology, 184: 314-327.

Fremaux, S.; S. M. Beheshti; H. Ghassemi and R. Shahsavan-Markadeh. (2015). An experimental study on hydrogen-rich gas production via steam gasification of biomass in a research-scale fluidized bed. Energy Conversion and Management, 91: 427-432.

Gökkaya, D. S.; T. Çokkuvvetli; M. Sağlam; M. Yüksel and L. Ballice. (2019). Hydrothermal gasification of poplar wood chips with alkali, mineral, and metal impregnated activated carbon catalysts. The Journal of Supercritical Fluids, 152: 104542.

Im-orb, K.; W. Wiyaratn and A. Arpornwichanop. (2018). Technical and economic assessment of the pyrolysis and gasification integrated process for biomass conversion. Energy, 153: 592-603.

Kumar, A.; V. Kumar and B. Singh. (2021). Cellulosic and hemicellulosic fractions of sugarcane bagasse: Potential, challenges and future perspective. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 169: 564-582.

Lamb, J. J. and Pollet, B. G. (2020). Future prospects of selected hydrogen and biomass energy technologies Hydrogen, Biomass and Bioenergy, Elsevier Ltd.

Mustapha, S. I.; U. A. Mohammed; F. Bux and Y. M. Isa. (2021). Hydrothermal gasification of Scenedesmus obliquus and its derivatives: a thermodynamic study using A spen P lus. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, 15(5): 1421 – 1430.

Okolie, J. A.; E. I. Epelle; S. Nanda; D. Castello; A. K. Dalai and J. A. Kozinski. (2021). Modeling and process optimization of hydrothermal gasification for hydrogen production: A comprehensive review. The Journal of Supercritical Fluids, 173: 105199.

Okolie, J. A.; S. Nanda; A. K. Dalai and J. A. Kozinski. (2020). Hydrothermal gasification of soybean straw and flax straw for hydrogen-rich syngas production: Experimental and thermodynamic modeling. Energy Conversion and Management, 208: 112545.

Okolie, J. A.; R. Rana; S. Nanda; A. K. Dalai and J. A. Kozinski. (2019). Supercritical water gasification of biomass: a state-of-the-art review of process parameters, reaction mechanisms and catalysis. Sustainable energy and fuels, 3(3): 578-598.

Parthasarathy, P. and Narayanan, K. S. (2014). Hydrogen production from steam gasification of biomass: influence of process parameters on hydrogen yield–a review. Renewable energy, 66: 570-579.

Rashidi, M. and Tavasoli, A. (2015). Hydrogen rich gas production via supercritical water gasification of sugarcane bagasse using unpromoted and copper promoted Ni/CNT nanocatalysts. The Journal of Supercritical Fluids, 98: 111-118.

Safari, F.; A. Tavasoli and A. Ataei. (2016). Gasification of sugarcane bagasse in supercritical water media for combined hydrogen and power production: a novel approach. International journal of environmental science and technology, 13(10): 2393-2400.

Sattar, A.; G. A. Leeke; A. Hornung and J. Wood. (2014). Steam gasification of rapeseed, wood, sewage sludge and miscanthus biochars for the production of a hydrogen-rich syngas. biomass and Bioenergy, 69: 276-286.

Sheikhdavoodi, M. J.; M. Almassi; M. Ebrahimi-Nik; A. Kruse and H. Bahrami. (2015). Gasification of sugarcane bagasse in supercritical water; evaluation of alkali catalysts for maximum hydrogen production. Journal of the Energy Institute, 88(4): 450-458.

Sikarwar, V. S.; M. Zhao; P. S. Fennell; N. Shah and E. J. Anthony. (2017). Progress in biofuel production from gasification. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 61: 189-248.

Tavares, R.; E. Monteiro; F. Tabet and A. Rouboa. (2020). Numerical investigation of optimum operating conditions for syngas and hydrogen production from biomass gasification using Aspen Plus. Renewable Energy, 146: 1309-1314.

Tavasoli, A.; M. Barati and A. Karimi. (2016). Sugarcane bagasse supercritical water gasification in presence of potassium promoted copper nano-catalysts supported on γ-Al2O3. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 41(1): 174-180.

Watson, J.; Y. Zhang; B. Si; W. T. Chen and R. de Souza. (2018). Gasification of biowaste: A critical review and outlooks. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 83: 1-17.

Yaghoubi, E.; Q. Xiong; M. H. Doranehgard; M. M. Yeganeh; G. Shahriari and M. Bidabadi. (2018). The effect of different operational parameters on hydrogen rich syngas production from biomass gasification in a dual fluidized bed gasifier. Chemical Engineering and Processing-Process Intensification, 126: 210-221.

Zhang, Y.; L. Li; P. Xu; B. Liu; Y. Shuai and B. Li. (2019). Hydrogen production through biomass gasification in supercritical water: a review from exergy aspect. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 44(30): 15727-15736.

Additional Files

Published

2022-12-31

Issue

Section

Articles