Effect of Calcination Temperatures of Kaolin on Compressive and Flexural Strengths of Metakaolin-Concrete

Authors

  • Dr. Yetunde Abiodun University of Lagos
  • Dr. Joseph Orisaleye University of Lagos, Nigeria
  • Prof. Samson Adeosun University of Lagos, Nigeria; Durban University of Technology, South Africa

Keywords:

Analysis of variance, Compressive strength, Flexural strength, Metakaolin, Temperature.

Abstract

The incorporation of pozzolanic materials in concrete construction is progressively increasing. This is due to technological advancement and climate change problems associated with carbon emissions resulting from the large-scale manufacturing of cement and its usage for concrete production. In this study, metakaolin obtained was used to partially substitute cement in metakaolin-concrete. Calcination temperatures of kaolin were varied from 500oC to 800oC at an interval of 100oC for 60 minutes. The metakaolin obtained was used to partially replace cement at 0, 5, 10, 15, 20 and 25 % by weight using a mix ratio of 1:2:4 and 0.4 water-cement ratio. Compressive strength test was carried out at curing ages of 7, 28 and 90 days, while the flexural strength test was performed at curing ages of 28 and 90 days. For both compressive and flexural strengths, 15 % by weight replacement with metakaolin gave the best strength values at all temperatures. An Increase in temperature led to a significant increase in the strength of metakaolin-concrete. ANOVA showed all factors significantly affected the flexural strength (P < 0.1), whilst the calcination temperature was significant (P < 0.1) to the compressive strength. This study showed that metakaolin is a supplementary cementitious material (SCM) and is a potential alternative to cement and can be used in the construction industry.  Also, the calcination temperature of kaolin has a significant effect on the properties of the resulting metakaolin-concrete produced from it.

References

Abiodun, Y.O.; O.M. Sadiq; S.O. Adeosun and G.L. Oyekan. (2019). Mineralogical Properties of Kaolin and Metakaolin from Selected Areas in Nigeria and Its Application to Concrete Production. West Indian Journal of Engineering, 42(1): 57-64.

Abiodun, Y.O.; O.M. Sadiq and S.O. Adeosun. (2020). Microstructural, mechanical and pozzolanic characteristics of metakaolin-based geopolymer, Geology, Geophysics and Environment, 46(1): 57-69. https://doi.org/10.7494/geol.2020.46.1.57

ASTM C618 (2012). Standard Specification for coal fly ash and raw or calcined natural pozzolans for use in concrete, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1520/C0618-12.

Ayeni, O. (2017). Performance of a Nigerian Metakaolin-Based Geopolymer as a Sustainable Building Material. Unpublished M.Sc. Thesis, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, African University of Science and Technology, Abuja, Nigeria. 1-98. Available online at: http://repository.aust.edu.ng/xmlui/handle/123456789/657. Accessed on September 9, 2022.

BS 12390-3 (2019). Testing Hardened Concrete: Compressive Strength of Test Specimens, British Standard Code of Practice, London, 2019.

BS 12390-5 (2019). Testing Hardened Concrete: Flexural Strength of Test Specimens, British Standard Code of Practice, London, 2019.

Batis, G.; P. Pantazopoulou; S. Tsivilis and E. Badogiannis. (2005). The effect of metakaolin on the corrosion behavior of cement mortars. Cement and Concrete Composites, 27(1): 125-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2004.02.041.

Charles, C.Z. (2003). The Dynamics of Racial Residential Segregation. Annual Review of Sociology, 29 (1): 167-207. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100002.

Davies, R. (2022). Flood in Nigeria. Available online at: https://floodlist.com/africa/nigeria-floods-update-october-2022. Accessed on October 19, 2022.

Dinakar, P.; P.K. Sahoo and G. Sriram. (2013). Effect of Metakaolin Content on the Properties of High Strength Concrete. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 7(2): 215–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40069-013-0045-0.

Dubey, A. and Banthia, N. (1998). Influence of high-reactivity metakaolin and silica fume on the flexural toughness of high-performance steel fiber-reinforced concrete. ACI Materials Journal, 95(2): 284-292.

Fasakin, J.O.; J.O. Basorun; M.O. Bello; B.K. Alese; E. Gabriel; O.F. Enisan; B. Ojo and O.O. Popoola. (2019). A dynamic e-land pricing mechanism for managing residential densities in a medium-sized city in southwest Nigeria. International Journal of Development and Economic Sustainability, 7(4): 8-26.

Kabir, O.K. (2004). Low-cost Technology and Mass Housing System in Nigerian Housing. Journal of Applied Sciences, 4(1): 565-567.

Kakali, T.; S. Perraki; T. Sivilis and E. Badogiannis. (2001). Thermal treatment of kaolin: The effect of mineralogy on the pozzolanic activity, Applied Clay Science, 20(1):73-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-1317(01)00040-0.

Kannan, V. and Ganesan, K. (2012). Strength and water absorption properties of ternary blended cement mortar using rice husk ash and metakaolin. Scholarly Journal of engineering research, 1(4): 51-59.

Kehinde, F. (2010). Housing policy and development in Nigeria. In Omotoso, F; Agagu, A. A. and Abegunde, O. (eds) Governance, Politics and Policies in Nigeria. Port Novo, Editions Sonoud’ Afrique. 104-115.

Khatib, J.M.; E.M. Negim and E. Gjonbalaj. (2012). High volume metakaolin as cement replacement in mortar. World Journal of Chemistry, 7(1): 7-10, DOI: 10.5829/idosi.wjc.2012.7.1.251.

Mindess, S.; J.F. Young and D. Darwin. (2003). Concrete, 2nd ed., Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River.

Mostafa, N.Y.; Q. Moshen; S.A.S. El-Hemaly; S.A. El-Korashy and P.W. Brown. (2010). High replacement of reactive pozzolan in blended cements: Microstructure and mechanical properties, Cement & Concrete Composites, 32(3): 386-391.

Mukherjee, S.P. and Vesmawala, G. (2013). Literature Review on Technical Aspect of Sustainable Concrete. International Journal of Engineering Science Invention, 2(8): 1-9.

Okafor, J.I.; O.V. Keke and D.J. Efobi. (2019). Assessment of Housing Quality and Environmental Degradation in Awka, Anambra State. Nigeria, International Journal of Innovative Research and Development, 8(5): 120-126.

Olabode, S.O. and Mohammed, M.Z. (2016). Depositional Facies and Sequence Stratigraphic Study in Parts of Benin (Dahomey) Basin SW Nigeria: Implications on the Re-Interpretation of Tertiary Sedimentary Successions. International Journal of Geosciences, 7(2): 210-228. https://doi.org/10.4236/ijg.2016.72017.

Olawale, S.B.; A.A. Lawal and J.O. Alabi. (2015). Nigeria Housing Policy: Any hope for the poor. American Research Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(4): 29-35.

Qian, X.I. and Li, Z.J. (2001). The relationships between stress and strain for high-performance concrete with metakaolin. Cement and Concrete Research, 31(11): 1607-1611. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(01)00612-3.

Sabir, B.B.; S. Wild and J. Bai. (2001). Metakaolin and calcined clays as pozzolans for concrete. Cement and Concrete Composites, 23(6): 441-454. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0958-9465(00)00092-5.

Sabria, M.M.; T.A. Mohamed; B. Karim and M. Ibrahim. (2010). Improvement of Rheological behaviour of cement pastes by incorporating metakaolin. European Journal of scientific research, 42(3): 442-452.

Shetty, M.S. and Jain, A.K. (2019). Concrete Technology: Theory and Practice, 8th ed, Ram Nagar, New-Delhi S. Chand and Company Ltd.

Tamanna, K.; S.N. Raman; M. Jamil and R. Hamid. (2020). Utilization of wood waste ash in construction technology: A review. Construction and Building Materials, 237(2): 117654.

Teixeira, E.R.; A. Camões; F.G. Branco; J.B. Aguiar and R. Fangueiro. (2019). Recycling of biomass and coal fly ash as cement replacement material and its effect of hydration and carbonation of concrete. Waste Management, 94(1): 39-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.05.044.

Tosti, L.; A. van Zomeren; J.R. Pels and R.N.J. Comans. (2018). Technical and environmental performance of lower carbon footprint cement mortars containing biomass fly ash as a secondary cementitious material. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 134(1): 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.03.004.

Published

2023-05-15