Effects of Concrete Grades on Strength Characteristics of Metakaolin Modified Recycled Aggregate Concrete

Authors

  • A. U. Adebanjo Osun State University
  • B. I. O. Dahunsi
  • J. O. Labiran

Keywords:

Recycled Aggregates, Conventional Concrete, Metakaolin, Split tensile strength, Compressive strength

Abstract

In this study, locally produced Metakaolin (MK) was used as an admixture in recycled aggregate concrete of grades M 25 and M 30. The content of MK varied from 0-15% at 5% intervals. The physical and mechanical properties (bulk density, specific gravity, water absorption, aggregate crushing value and aggregate impact value) of aggregates were determined, the chemical composition as well as reactivity of MK was evaluated using X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) technique and modified Chappelle test. The workability (slump) and strength (compressive and split tensile) properties of fresh and hardened RAC were examined relative to that of conventional concrete. The results of the experiments revealed that the specific gravity (SG), water absorption and aggregate impact value of recycled aggregates (RA) were 2.23, 5.35% and 32%, respectively. The MK used had an optimum reactivity of 2060.8 mg of Ca(OH)2 fixed at a temperature of 660 oC. The slump values for M 25 and M 30 control specimens were 72 mm and 65 mm, respectively while the slump values of MK modified RAC decreased from 67-45 mm for M 25 and 55-35 mm for M 30 as MK increased from 0-15%. The 56th-day compressive strength of the control samples was 21.73 N/mm2 for M 25 and 26.8 N/mm2 for M 30, respectively, while RAC samples ranged from 14.96 - 17.04 N/mm2 for M 25 and 20.55 - 22.67 N/mm2 for M 30 whereas the split tensile strength for the control samples was 2.71 N/mm2 and 3.06 N/mm2 for the two grades in that sequence, while those of RAC ranged from 2.26-2.49 N/mm2 for M 25 and 2.62 – 2.84 N/mm2 for M 30. Despite the fact that metakaolin modified RAC had lower strength properties than conventional concrete, the use of 10% metakaolin as a RA modifier in concrete production will provide a sustainable alternative to conventional aggregates in concrete mix design.

References

Akhtar, A. and Sarmah, A. K. (2018). Construction and Demolition Waste Generation and Properties of Recycled Aggregate Concrete: A Global Perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 186: 262–281. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.085

Al-Bayati, H. K. A.; Das, P. K.; Tighe, S. L.; and Baaj, H. (2016). Evaluation of Various Treatment Methods for Enhancing The Physical and Morphological Properties of Coarse Recycled Concrete Aggregate. Construction and Building Materials, 112: 284-298. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.176

ASTM C29/C29-M09 (2009) Standard test Method for bulk density (“unit weight”) and voids in aggregates. ASTM American Society for Testing of Materials (ASTM), West Conshohocken, PA.

ASTM C618-08 (2012). Standard Specification For Coal Fly Ash and Raw or Calcined Natural Pozzolan For Use In Concrete, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.

Bravo, M.; de Brito, J.; Pontes, J. and Evangelista, L. (2015). Mechanical Performance of Concrete Made with Aggregates From Construction and Demolition Waste Recycling Plants. Journal of Cleaner Production, 99: 59 - 74. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.012

BS 1881-124:2015+A1:2021 (2021). Testing Concrete. Methods for analysis of hardened concrete. British Standards Institution, London.

BS EN 1097-2:2020 (2020)Tests for mechanical and physical properties of aggregates. Methods for the determination of resistance to fragmentation. British Standards Institution, London.

BS EN 12620:2002+A1:2008 (2008). Aggregates for concrete. British Standards Institution, London

Deloitte, M.A (2014). Construction and Demolition Waste management in Netherlands URL http://ec.europa.eu/environment/waste/studies/deliverables/CDW_The 26 Netherlands_Factsheet_Final.pdf

Dhanada, K. M.; Christopher, K. Y. L. and Jing , Y. (2018). Smart Concrete, The Indian Concrete Journal, 92 (6): 64-68

Dinakar, P.; Sahoo, P. K. and Sriram, G. (2013). Effect of Metakaolin Content on the Properties of High Strength Concrete. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 7 (3): 215–223. doi:10.1007/s40069-013-0045-0

Donatello, S.; Tyrer, M. and Cheeseman, C. R (2010). Comparison of Test Methods to Assess Pozzolanic Activity. Cement and Concrete Composites, 32 (2): 121-127. doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.10.008

Eduardo, F.; Andrejkovičová, S.; Hajjaji, W.; Velosa, A. L.; Silva, A. S and Rocha, F. (1798) Pozzolanic Activity of Metakaolins by the French Standard of the Modified Chapelle Test: A Direct Methodology. Geomater 12 (3): 289–298.

Gagan, A. and Sumit, A. (2015). Recycled Aggregates: A Sustainable Solution of Construction and Demolished Waste National Conference on Advances in Engineering, Technology & Management (AETM’15), IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering (IOSR-JMCE) e-ISSN: 2278-1684, p-ISSN: 2320-334X. 58-63

Ghorpade, V.G. and Rao, H.S. (2011). Chloride Ion Permeability Studies of Metakaolin Based High Performance Concrete. International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 3 (2): 1617-1623.

Grabiec A. M.; Klama, J.; Zawal, D.; and Krupa, D. (2012). Modification of Recycled Concrete Aggregate by Calcium Carbonate Bio-Deposition. Construction and Building Materials 34: 145–150

Gushit, J. S.; Olotu, P. N.; Maikudi, S. and Gyang, J. D. (2010). Overview of The Availability and Utilization of Kaolin as a Potential Raw Material in Chemical and Drug Formulation in Nigeria. Continental Journal of Sustainable Development, 1: 17-22.

Hassan, A. A.; Ismail, M. K. and Mayo, J. (2015). Mechanical Properties of Self-Consolidating Concrete Containing Lightweight Recycled Aggregate in Different Mixture Compositions. Journal of Building Engineering, 4:113 - 126.

Ismail, S. and Ramli, M. (2013). Engineering Properties of Treated Recycled Concrete Aggregate for Structural Applications. Construction and Building Materials, 44: 464 – 476.

Ismail, S.; Husain, V.; and Anjum, S. (2014). Mineralogy and Genesis of Nagar Parker Kaolin Deposits, Tharparkar District, Sindh, Pakistan. International Journal of Economic and Environmental Geology, 5 (1): 33-40

Jagtap, S. A.; Shirsath, M. N. and Karpe, A. L. (2017). Effect of Metakaolin on the Properties of Concrete. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056, 4 (7): 643-645

Juan D. M. S. and Gutiérrez P. A (2019). Study on the Influence of Attached Mortar Content on the Properties of Recycled Concrete Aggregate. Construction and Building Materials 23(2): 872–877

Kapoor, K.; Singh, S. P. and Singh, B. (2016). Durability of Self-Compacting Concrete Made With Recycled Concrete Aggregates and Mineral Admixtures. Constr. Build. Mater. 128, 67– 3 76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.10.026

Katkhuda, H. and Shatarat, N. (2017). Improving The Mechanical Properties of Recycled Concrete Aggregate Using Chopped Basalt Fibers and Acid Treatment Construction and Building Materials 140: 328–335

Kazmi, S. M. S.; Munir, M. J.; Wu, Y.F.; Patnaikuni, I.; Zhoua, Y. and Xing, F. (2019). Influence of Different Treatment Methods on The Mechanical Behaviour of Recycled Aggregate Concrete: A Comparative Study. Cement and Concrete Composites, 104: p103398

Kim H.; Park, S. and Kim H (2016). The Optimum Production Method for Quality Improvement of Recycled Aggregates Using Sulfuric Acid and The Abrasion Method. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13(8): 769–783.

Kim, H.K. and Lee, H.K. (2011). Use of Power Plant Bottom Ash as Fine and Coarse Aggregates in High-Strength Concrete.Construction and Building Materials, 25(2): 1115-1122. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.06.065

Kou, S. C.; Poon, C. S. and Agrela, F. (2011). Comparisons of Natural and Recycled Aggregate Concretes Prepared with The Addition of Different Mineral Admixtures. Cem. Concr. Compos. 33: 788–795.

Kukadia, V. P.; Parekh, D. N. and Gajjar, R . K. (2017). Influence of Aggregate’s Treatment on Properties of Recycled Aggregate Concrete. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), 8 (3): 351–361.

Li, M.; Kühlen, A.; Yang, J. and Schultmann, F. (2013). Improvement of The Statutory Framework for Construction and Demolition Waste Management Exemplified In Germany And Australia. In: Urban Environment, Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7756-9_2

Lotfy, A. and Al-Fayez, M. (2015). Performance Evaluation of Structural Concrete Using Controlled Quality Coarse and Fine Recycled Concrete Aggregate. Cem. Concr. Compos, 61: 36 – 43. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7756-9_2

Martín-Morales, M.; Zamorano, M.; Ruiz-Moyano, A. and Valverde-Espinosa, I. (2011). Characterization of Recycled Aggregates Construction and Demolition Waste For Concrete Production Following The Spanish Structural Concrete Code EHE-08. Constr. Build. Mater. 25: 742 – 748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.07.012

Mermerdaş, K.; Gesoğlu, M.; Güneyisi, E. and Özturan, T. (2012). Strength Development of Concretes Incorporated with Metakaolin and Different Types of Calcined Kaolins. Construction and Building Materials, 37: 766-774.

Monterio, P. J. M.; Miller, S. A. and Horvath, A. (2017). Towards Sustainable Concrete, Nature Materials, 16 (7): 698 - 699

Muduli, R. and Mukharjee, B. B. (2019). Effect of Incorporation of Metakaolin and Recycled Coarse Aggregate on Properties of Concrete. Journal of Cleaner Production, 209: 398 - 414 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.221

Narmatha, M. and Felixkala, T. (2016). Metakaolin –The Best Material for Replacement of Cement in Concrete. International Journal of Advanced Research, 4 (7): 1690 – 1696

NF P18-513 (2012). Addition for concrete - Metakaolin - Specifications and conformity criteria - Métakaolin, addition pouzzolanique pour bétons French Standard

Oladejo, W. O. (2017). Influence of Coarse Aggregate Size on Strength of Concrete. Unpublished M.Sc. Thesis. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Ibadan, Nigeria

Patil, S. N.; Gupta, A. K. and Deshpande, S. S. (2013). Metakaolin-Pozzolanic Material for Cement In High Strength Concrete. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Emerging Trends in Engineering (SICETE’13), 46-49

Polat, G.; Damci, A.; Turkoglu, H. and Gurgun, A. P. (2017). Identification of Root Causes of Construction and Demolition (C&D) Waste: The Case of Turkey. Procedia Engineering, 196, 948-955.

Qiu, J.; Tng, D. Q. S. and Yang, E. H. (2014). Surface Treatment of Recycled Concrete Aggregates Through Microbial Carbonate Precipitation. Construction and Building Materials, 57: 144–150.

Radonjanin, V.; Malešev, M.; Marinković, S. and Al Malty, A. E. S. (2013). Green Recycled Aggregate Concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 47: 1503 – 1511.

Ramezanianpour, A. A. and Bahrami, H. J. (2012). Influence of Metakaolin on The Performance of Mortars and Concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 30: 470-478.

Rodríguez, G.; Medina, C.; Alegre, F. J.; Asensio, E. and De Sánchez Rojas, M. I. (2015). Assessment of Construction and Demolition Waste Plant Management in Spain: In Pursuit of Sustainability and Eco-Efficiency. Journal of Cleaner Production, 90: 16–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.11.067

Saravanakumar, P. and Dhinakaran, G. (2012) Effect of Admixed Recycled Aggregate Concrete on Properties of Fresh and Hardened Concrete, J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 24 (4): 494 – 498.

Saravanakumar, P.; Abhiram, K. and Manoj, B. (2016). Properties of Treated Recycled Aggregates and Its Influence on Concrete Strength Characteristics. Construction and Building Materials, 111: 611– 617. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.064

Shafiq, N.; Nuruddin, M. F.; Khan, S. U. and Ayub, T. (2015). Calcined Kaolin as Cement Replacing Material and Its Use In High Strength Concrete. Constr. Build. Mater., 81: 313–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.02.050

Shen, J. N.; Xie, Z. X.; Griggs, D. and Shi, Y. Z. (2012). Effects of Kaolin on Engineering Properties of Portland Cement Concrete. In Applied Mechanics and Materials, 174: 76-81, Trans Tech Publications Ltd.

Shi, C.; Li, Y.; Zhang, J.; Li, W. Chong, L. and Xie, Z., (2016). Performance Enhancement of Recycled Concrete Aggregate–A Review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112: 466 - 472.

Siddique, R. and Kaur, A. (2011). Effect of Metakaolin on The Near Surface Characteristics of Concrete.Material Structures, 44: 77–88 https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-010-9610-z

Spaeth, V. and Tegguer, A. D. (2013). Improvement of Recycled Concrete Aggregate Properties by Polymer Treatments. International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment 2(2): 143 – 152.

Talabi, A. O.; Ademilua, O. L. and Akinola, O. O. (2012). Compositional Features and Industrial Application of Ikere Kaolinite, Southwestern Nigeria. Research Journal in Engineering and Applied Sciences, 1(5): 327 – 333

Xiao, J. Z. (2012). Recycled Concrete. Chinese Building Construction Press, Beijing, China.

Yilmaz, G. (2011). The Effects of Temperature on the Characteristics of Kaolinite and Bentonite. Scientific Research and Essays, 6 (9): 1928 - 1939.

Zega C.J and Di Maio A.A (2011). Use of Recycled Fine Aggregate in Concretes with Durable Requirements. Waste Management, 31 (11): 2336 – 2340.

Zhang, H.; Zhao, Y.; Meng, T. and Shah, S. (2015a). The Modification Effects of A Nano-Silica Slurry on Microstructure, Strength, and Strain Development of Recycled Aggregate Concrete Applied in an Enlarged Structural Test. Construction and Building Materials, 95: 721 – 735.

Zhang, J.; Shi, C.; Li, Y.; Pan, X.; Poon, C. S. and Xie, Z. (2015b). Performance Enhancement of Recycled Concrete Aggregates Through Carbonation. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering 29 (11): 1 – 7.

Additional Files

Published

2021-10-06

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)