A New Approach of Image Denoising Based on Adaptive Multi-Resolution Technique

Authors

  • Lalit Mohan Satapathy SOA Deemed to be University
  • Pranati Das

Keywords:

Image de-noising, Adaptive multi-resolution, BEMD, PSNR, RMSE, SSIM

Abstract

Medical imaging and diagnostic techniques have become popular over the last two decades with the advancement of data science, data analysis, data storage, and the internet. The impact of this evolution can be seen in the fields of telemedicine and medical sciences, which allow more effective detection and treatment of various diseases. Like any other form of imaging technique, medical images are sensitive to noise and artifacts. The images become unclear with the presence of noise, and the diseases cannot be identified properly. Therefore, image denoising plays a vital role in the field of biomedical image processing. As a result, work must be done to minimize noise without sacrificing image quality. Various methods for reducing noise have already been proposed in the literature. Each method has its own set of benefits and drawbacks. In this paper, we introduce a bi-dimensional empirical mode decomposition (BEMD)-based image de-noising approach. The principal purpose of this research is to decompose noisy images depending on frequency and create a hybrid algorithm that incorporates existing de-noising approaches. The proposed algorithm is an image-dependent technique that decomposes the noisy image into several IMFs with residue, then considering the individual attributes of the IMFs, they are separately filtered. Furthermore equalization is applied to the residue for preserving the edge information. A comprehensive study is conducted over the experimental results of the benchmark test images using different performance measure matrices to quantify the effectiveness of the presented approach. In terms of subjective and objective evaluation, the reconstructed image is found to be more accurate and visually pleasing. It also outperforms the state-of-the-art image-denoising methods, especially in terms of PSNR, RMSE, correlation, and structural similarity.

Author Biography

Pranati Das

Professor, Department of EE,  IGIT Sarang, Odisha, India

References

Adamo, F.; Andria, G.; F. Attivissimo; A. M. L. Lanzolla, and M. Spadavecchia (2013). Acomparative study on mother wavelet selection in ultrasound image denoising. Measurement,46(8):2447–2456.

Bnou, K.; S. Raghay and A. Hakim (2020). A wavelet denoising approach based on unsupervised learning model. EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process.36.

Chang, S. G.; B. Yu and M. Vetterli (2000). Adaptive wavelet thresholding for image denoising and compression, in IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 9(9):1532-1546.

Dong, W.; X. Li; X. Lin and Z. Li (2014). A Bidimensional Empirical Mode Decomposition Method for Fusion of Multispectral and Panchromatic Remote Sensing Images. Remote Sensing.6:8446-8467.

Donoho, D. L.(1995). De-noising by soft-thresholding, in IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 41(3) : 613-627.

Ellinas, J. N.; T. Mandadelis,; A. Tzortzis, and L. Aslanoglou, (2004). Image de-noising using wavelets. TEI of Piraeus Applied Research Review, 9(1), 97-109.

Fedak, V. and Nakonechnyy, A. (2015). Adaptive wavelet thresholding for image denoising using SURE Minimizationand Clustering of Wavelet Coefficients. Technical Transaction on Electrical Engineering, 197–210.

Gonzalez, R. C. and Woods, R. E. (2007). Digital Image Processing. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.

Gupta, D. and Ahmad, M. (2018). Brain MR image denoising based on wavelet transform. Int. J. Appl. Technol. Eng. Explor, 5(38): 11–16.

Hamada A. (2020), Brain tumor detection, Available online at: https://www.kaggle.com/navoneel/brain-mri-images-for-brain-tumor-detection (collected on 15/03/2021)

Huang, N. E.; Shen, Z.; Long, S. R.; Wu, M. C.;Shih, H. H.; Zheng, Q. ; Yen, N. ; Tung, C. C. , and Liu, H. H. (1998).The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A.454903–995

Kimlyk, M., and Umnyashkin, S. (2018). Image denoising using discrete wavelet transform and edge information. IEEE Conference of Russian Young Researchers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering (EIConRus): 1823-1825.

Kumar, B. K. S. (2013). Image denoising based on non-local means filter and its method noise thresholding. Signal, Image and Video Processing,7(6):1211–1227.

Lidong, H.; Wei, Z.; Jun, W., and Zebin, S. (2015). Combination of contrast limited adaptive histogram equalisation and discrete wavelet transform for image enhancement, IET Image Process, 9(10): 908-915.

Madadi, Z.; G. V. Anand and A.B. Premkumar (2013). Signal detection in generalized Gaussian noise by nonlinear wavelet denoising. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I Reg. Papers, 60(11) :2973-2986.

Mallat, S. (2008). A Wavelet tour of signal processing: the sparse way, 3rd edition. Academic Press, Elsevier, Burlington.

Naidu, V. P. S. and Raol, J. R. (2008). Pixel-level image fusion using wavelets and principal component analysis. Defense ScienceJournal. 58(3):338–52.

Qi, C., and Li, Q. (2016). The improved method of wavelet denoising for nonlinear signal, Manufacturing Automation, 38:14-17.

Sagheer, S. V. M. and George, S. N. (2020). A review on medical image denoising algorithms, Biomedical Signal Processing and Control,Vol. 61.

Satapathy, L. M.; A. Dalai; S. Satapathy and A. Jena (2018). Satellite image enhancement based on multi-technology fusion, 2018 Second International Conference on Inventive Communication and Computational Technologies (ICICCT), Coimbatore, 1677-1680.

Srivastava, M.; C. L. Anderson, and J. H. Freed (2016). A new wavelet denoising method for selecting decomposition levels and noise thresholds, IEEE Access Practical Innovations Open Solutions, 4: 3862-3877.

Tiwari, A., and Singh, P. (2014). Analysis of Color Contrast Enhancement Techniques, International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering,4(4):185-191

Yan, R.; L. Shao and Y. Liu, (2013). Nonlocal hierarchical dictionary learning using wavelets for image denoising. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 22(12):4689–4698

Zhang, X. (2016). Image denoising using dual-tree complex wavelet transform and wiener filter with modified thresholding. J Sci Ind Res India, 75(11):687–690.

Zhou W. and Bovik, A. (2009). Mean squared error: Love it or leave it? A new look at Signal Fidelity Measures, in IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 26(1): 98-117.

Additional Files

Published

2022-04-18

Issue

Section

Articles