Evaluating the Mechanical Performance of Cold Mix Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement Incorporating Crumb Rubber

Authors

  • K. G. Yusuf Department of Civil engineering, Pan African University Institute for Basic Science, Technology and Innovation, Kenya.
  • C. Kanali Department of Agricultural and Bio-systems Engineering, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Kenya
  • E. B. Ogunbode Department of Building, Federal University of Technology Minna, Nigeria.

Keywords:

crumb rubber, reclaimed asphalt pavement, rutting, moisture susceptibility, indirect tensile strength, Cold mix asphalt

Abstract

Cold mix asphalt (CMA), produced at ambient temperature, is less energy-intensive, cleaner and safer than hot mix asphalt, making it well-suited to rural low-volume roads. Durability is nevertheless limited by incomplete binder coating, high air voids and residual moisture, which promote moisture damage and rutting, while surface-treated crumb rubber has yet to be combined with cold-mix reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP). This study therefore evaluated cold mix RAP incorporating NaOH-treated crumb rubber. Materials were characterised by physical, XRF, XRD and binder-recovery tests, and crumb rubber (2.00-0.075 mm) was NaOH-treated at 70 °C for 2 h, then oven-dried at 60 °C for 24 h. Three dense-graded mixes within the TRRL envelope were designed: virgin aggregate, 50:50 RAP, and RAP with rubber replacing the 0/6 mm fines at 0.5-3.0%. Initial emulsion and premix water contents followed the MS-14 formula and coating tests, while optimum contents came from second-order polynomial regression of dry density, indirect tensile strength (ITS) and air voids. Marshall specimens (50 blows, cured at 40 ± 1 °C for 72 h) were tested for dry and soaked ITS to determine the tensile strength ratio (TSR) and for rutting using the Hamburg wheel tracking test (50 °C, 705 N, 10,000 passes), and the results were compared using a t-test (? = 0.05). The RAP mix required 8.2% fluid and 6.2% emulsion, compared with 11.0% and 8.9% for the virgin mix, a 30% saving, with air voids of 9.6% versus 11.5% and TSR of 0.83 versus 0.86. At the optimum 1.8% rubber, air voids fell to 8.0%, TSR rose to 1.15 and mean rut depth fell from 2.74 ± 0.43 to 2.12 ± 0.22 mm, a significant 22.63% improvement (p = 0.043). Treated crumb rubber therefore mitigates both moisture damage and rutting, and 1.8% is recommended for cold mix RAP surfacing of low-volume rural roads carrying up to one million equivalent standard axles.

Author Biographies

C. Kanali, Department of Agricultural and Bio-systems Engineering, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Kenya

I am a  professor in the department of Environmental and Bio-resources Engineering at Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology (JKUAT) Juja-Nairobi.

E. B. Ogunbode, Department of Building, Federal University of Technology Minna, Nigeria.

I an associate professor from the department of building technology at the Federal University of Technology Minna, Nigeria.

References

AASHTO T-283 (2021) ‘Standard Method of Test for Resistance of Compacted Asphalt Mixtures to Moisture-Induced Damage standard by American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials’. USA, p. 10.

Addae, D.T., Rahman, M. and Abed, A. (2023) ‘State of art literature review on the mechanical, functional and long-term performance of cold mix asphalt mixtures’, Construction and Building Materials, 400, p. 132759. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132759.

Al-Mohammedawi, A. and Mollenhauer, K. (2022) ‘Current Research and Challenges in Bitumen Emulsion Manufacturing and Its Properties’, Materials, 15(6), p. 2026. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15062026.

Antunes, V., Freire, A.C. and Neves, J. (2019) ‘A review on the effect of RAP recycling on bituminous mixtures properties and the viability of multi-recycling’, Construction and Building Materials, 211, pp. 453–469. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.258.

Arshad, A.K. et al. (2018) ‘Performance evaluation of dense graded cold mix asphalt’, International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 9(10), pp. 549–557.

Asiya, A. et al. (2024) ‘Modification of Cold Mix’, International Journal of engineering Research & Technology, 13(4), p. 4.

Asphalt Institute (1989) Asphalt Cold-Mix Manual. Manual Series No. 14 (MS-14). 3rd editio. Lexington, KY: Asphalt Institute.

ASTM D36 (2020) ‘Test Method for Softening Point of Bitumen (Ring-and-Ball Apparatus)’, Standard [Preprint]. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1520/D0036_D0036M-14R20.

ASTM D5 (2020) ‘Test Method for Penetration of Bituminous Materials’. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, p. 3. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1520/D0005_D0005M-20.

ASTM D6934-22 (2022) ‘Test Method for Residue by Evaporation of Emulsified Asphalt’. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, p. 3. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1520/D6934-22.

BS EN 12697-23 (2017) Bituminous mixtures. Test methods Part 23: Determination of the indirect tensile strength of bituminous specimens., Standard. London.

BS EN 12697-3:2013+A1:2018 (2021) ‘Bituminous mixtures. Test methods Bitumen recovery. Rotary evaporator’, in Standard, p. 18.

Buczy?ski, P. and Iwa?ski, M. (2017) ‘Fatigue Life Comparison of Recycled Cold Mixes with Foamed Bitumen and with Bitumen Emulsion’, Procedia Engineering, 172, pp. 135–142. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.02.035.

Chelelgo, K., Gariy, Z.C.A. and Shitote, S.M. (2018) ‘Laboratory mix design of cold bitumen emulsion mixtures incorporating reclaimed asphalt and virgin aggregates’, Buildings, 8(12). Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings8120177.

Chu, F. et al. (2025) ‘Investigation on the pavement performance and application of cold mix emulsified asphalt mixture in the surface layer’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 507, p. 145542. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145542.

Darter, M.I. et al. (1979) ‘Design of Emulsified Asphalt-Aggregate Bases for Low Volume Roads’, Transportation Research Record, 702(18), pp. 164–172.

Dash, S.S., Chandrappa, A.K. and Sahoo, U.C. (2022) ‘Design and performance of cold mix asphalt – A review’, Construction and Building Materials, 315, p. 125687. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125687.

EN 12697-22 (2020) ‘Bituminous mixtures - Test methods - Part 22: Wheel Tracking’, iTeh STANDARD PREVIEW. Slovenia: iTeh Stanard Preview, p. 12. Available at: https://standards.iteh.ai/catalog/standards/sist/aa69265c-73f1-4cc8-a4c8-a4a61d321c21/sist-en-12697-22-2020.

Indian Raods Congress (2014) IRC:SP:100-2014:Use of cold mix technology in construction and maintenance of roads using bitumen emulsion. New Delhi: Indian Roads Congress. Available at: https://law.resource.org/pub/in/bis/irc/irc.gov.in.sp.100.2014.pdf.

Jain, S. and Singh, B. (2021) ‘Cold mix asphalt: An overview’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 280, p. 124378. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124378.

Langevin, D. (2009) ‘Complexation of oppositely charged polyelectrolytes and surfactants in aqueous solutions. A review’, Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 147–148, pp. 170–177. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2008.08.013.

Ling, C., Hanz, A. and Bahia, H. (2016) ‘Measuring moisture susceptibility of Cold Mix Asphalt with a modified boiling test based on digital imaging’, Construction and Building Materials, 105, pp. 391–399. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.093.

Mallick, R.B., Kandhal, P.S. and Bradbury, R.L. (2008) ‘Using Warm-Mix Asphalt Technology to Incorporate High Percentage of Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement Material in Asphalt Mixtures’, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2051(1), pp. 71–79. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3141/2051-09.

Mathaniya, T.E. (2006) ‘Characterisation of fatique performance of selected cold bituminous mixes’. Stellenbosh, p. 256.

MS-2 (2014) Mix Design Methods for Asphalt Concrete and Other Hot-Mix Types. Manual Series No. 2 (MS-2). 7th Edicti, Asphalt Institute. 7th Edicti. Lexington, KY: Asphalt Institute.

Poranic, J. (2009) ‘An Investigation into Cold In-place Recycling of Asphalt Pavement’, The University of Nottingham. Nottingham, p. 211.

Pstrowska, K. et al. (2022) ‘Adhesion in Bitumen/Aggregate System: Adhesion Mechanism and Test Methods’, Coatings, 12(12), p. 1934. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12121934.

Ramarad, S. et al. (2015) ‘Waste tire rubber in polymer blends: A review on the evolution, properties and future’, Progress in Materials Science, 72, pp. 100–140. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2015.02.004.

Read and Whiteoak (2003) The Shell Bitumen Handbook. 5th editio. London: Thomas Telford. Available at: https://books.google.com/books/about/The_Shell_Bitumen_Handbook.html?id=6mA-Hh0IQgEC.

Rezaei, M. et al. (2017) ‘Investigation of Rutting Resistance and Moisture Damage of Cold Asphalt Mixes’, Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 29(10). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002042.

Rodr??guez-Valverde, M.A. et al. (2003) ‘Stability of highly charged particles: bitumen-in-water dispersions’, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 222(1–3), pp. 233–251. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-7757(03)00228-0.

Salomon., D.R. (2006) Asphalt Emulsion Technology., Transportation research circular. Washington DC: Transportation Research Board. Available at: https://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/circulars/ec102.pdf.

Shams, H. et al. (2025) ‘Investigating the performance of asphalt pavements modified with reclaimed asphalt and crumb rubber’, Scientific Reports, 15(1), pp. 1–12. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-17909-y.

Thanaya, I Nyoman Arya (2007) ‘Evaluating and Improving the Performance of Cold Asphalt Emulsion Mixes’, Civil Engineering Dimension, 9(2), pp. 64–69. Available at: http://puslit2.petra.ac.id/ejournal/index.php/civ/article/view/16651.

Tia, M. and Wood, L.E. (1983) ‘Use of Asphalt Emulsion and Foamed Asphalt in Cold-Recycled Asphalt Paving Mixtures.’, Transportation Research Record, pp. 315–322.

Tushar, Q. et al. (2022) ‘Recycling waste vehicle tyres into crumb rubber and the transition to renewable energy sources: A comprehensive life cycle assessment’, Journal of Environmental Management, 323, p. 116289. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116289.

Vaitkus, A. et al. (2016) ‘Influence of warm mix asphalt technology on asphalt physical and mechanical properties’, Construction and Building Materials, 112, pp. 800–806. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.212.

Wang, X. et al. (2022) ‘Investigations on Adhesion Characteristics between High-Content Rubberized Asphalt and Aggregates’, Polymers, 14(24), p. 5474. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14245474.

West, R. et al. (2018) ‘Development of a framework for balanced mix design’, Project NCHRP 20-07/Task 406, pp. 7–20.

Wirtgen GmbH (2012) Wirtgen Cold Recycling Technology. 1st editio. Windhagen, Germany: Wirtgen GmbH. Available at: https://www.wirtgen-group.com/en-us/parts-and-service/training/hands-on-manuals/cold-recycling.

Wulandari, P.S. et al. (2019) ‘Effect of Crumb Rubber as Fine Aggregate Replacement in Cold Mixture Asphalt’, Civil Engineering Dimension, 21(2), pp. 107–112. Available at: https://doi.org/10.9744/ced.21.2.107-112.

Xu, L. et al. (2025) ‘Effect of Bonding Characteristics on Rutting Resistance and Moisture Susceptibility of Rubberized Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement’, Infrastructures, 10(12), pp. 1–18. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures10120336.

Yu, H. et al. (2020) ‘Effect of mixing sequence on asphalt mixtures containing waste tire rubber and warm mix surfactants’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 246, p. 119008. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119008.

Zaumanis, M., Mallick, R.B. and Frank, R. (2014) ‘100% recycled hot mix asphalt: A review and analysis’, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 92, pp. 230–245. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.07.007.

Published

2026-06-30