OPTIMIZATION OF BINDER CONCENTRATION AND PARTICLE SIZE FOR ELEPHANT GRASS AND SAWDUST

Authors

  • E. I. Ugwu Department of Agricultural and Bioresources Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Nigeria, Nsukka & Eco-Hydrological Systems Research Unit, University of Nigeria, Nsukka
  • N. N. Aneke Department of Agricultural and Bioresources Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Nigeria, Nsukka & African Centre for Excellence for Sustainable Power and Energy Development, University of Nigeria, Nsukka
  • A. Okoro Department of Civil Engineering, Enugu State Polytechnic, Iwollo, Ezeagu, Nigeria
  • T. Ekemezie-Okoye Department of Civil Engineering, Enugu State Polytechnic, Iwollo, Ezeagu, Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63746/njtd.v23i1.4038

Keywords:

Briquettes, Waste biomass, Elephant grass, Sawdust, Cissus populnea (okoho)

Abstract

The increasing demand for sustainable energy alternatives has renewed interest in the utilization of agricultural and forestry residues for solid biofuel production. In this study, elephant grass and sawdust were evaluated as feedstocks for briquette production using Cissus populnea (okoho) as a natural binder. Both biomass types, considered waste resources, were milled and sieved into four particle size fractions (1000, 500, 300, and 212 µm). Briquettes were produced with binder concentrations ranging from 0 to 35% and subsequently subjected to proximate analysis, density determination, compressive strength, shatter resistance, tumbling resistance, and higher heating value tests. Response surface methodology was employed to generate predictive models, while ANOVA and regression analyses were used to assess factor significance. Results showed that binder concentration and particle size significantly influenced briquette quality parameters (p<0.05), with higher binder levels and smaller particle sizes generally improving density and mechanical strength. Both feedstocks demonstrated good performance; however, sawdust briquettes exhibited superior overall properties, indicating their greater suitability for high-quality briquette production. These findings underscore the potential of locally available waste biomass and natural binders in the development of renewable energy solutions.

Author Biography

E. I. Ugwu, Department of Agricultural and Bioresources Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Nigeria, Nsukka & Eco-Hydrological Systems Research Unit, University of Nigeria, Nsukka

Senior Lecturer, Department of Agricultural and Bioresources Engineering, University of Nigeria, Nsukka

References

K.O. Adebowale; L.M. Nwokocha and W.B. Agbaje. (2013). Composition of Cissus populnea stem. J. Food Compos. Anal. 30, 41–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2013.01.001

K.A. Adegoke; O.O. Adesina; O.A. Okon-Akan; O.R. Adegoke; A.B. Olabintan; O.A. Ajala; H. Olagoke; N.W. Maxakato and O.S. Bello. (2022). Sawdust-biomass based materials for sequestration of organic and inorganic pollutants and potential for engineering applications. Curr. Res. Green Sustain. Chem. 5, 100274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crgsc.2022.100274

O.M. Aina; A. Adetogun and K.A. Iyiola. (2009). Heat Energy From Value-Added Sawdust Briquettes Of Albizia Zygia. Ethiop. J. Environ. Stud. Manag. 2. https://doi.org/10.4314/ejesm.v2i1.43501

J.S. Alakali; S.V. Irtwange and M. Mkavga. (2009). Rheological characteristics of food gum (Cissus populnea). Afr. J. Food Sci. 3(a), 237–242.

C. Antwi-Boasiako and B.B. Acheampong. (2016). Strength properties and calorific values of sawdust-briquettes as wood-residue energy generation source from tropical hardwoods of different densities. Biomass Bioenergy 85, 144–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.12.006

ASTM 440, (2019). Standard Test Method for Drop Shatter Test for Coal. Am. Soc. Test. Mater. ASTM

ASTM, D.-06, (2006). Standard Test Method for Unconfined Compressive Strength of Cohesive Soil. ASTM International. Am. Soc. Test. Mater. ASTM

ASTM D441, (2021). Standard Test Method of Tumbler Test for Coal. Am. Soc. Test. Mater. ASTM.

ASTM, E.-01, (2027) Standard Test Method for Ash in Biomass. Am. Soc. Test. Mater. ASTM.

ASTM, E.-82, (2013). Standard Test Method for Moisture Analysis of Particulate Wood Fuels. Am. Soc. Test. Mater. ASTM.

F. Batool; K. Islam; C. Cakiroglu and A. Shahriar (2021).

Effectiveness of wood waste sawdust to produce medium- to low-strength concrete materials. J. Build. Eng. 44, 103237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103237

D. Boateng; J. Bloomer and J. Morrissey. (2025). Dilemmas and decision-making: Exploring households’ perspectives on the energy-environment-livelihoods nexus in off-grid rural Ghana. Energy Sustain. Dev. 85, 101604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2024.101604

Braga, R.M., Melo, D.M.A., Aquino, F.M., Freitas, J.C.O., Melo, M.A.F., Barros, J.M.F., Fontes, M.S.B., 2014. (2021). Characterization and comparative study of pyrolysis kinetics of the rice husk and the elephant grass. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 115, 1915–1920. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-013-3503-7

G.H. da Silva; N. dos Santos Renato; F.F. Coelho; T.P. Donato; A.J.D. dos Reis; M.H. Otenio and J.C. Machado (2025). Energy potential of elephant grass broth as biomass for biogas production. Sci. Rep. 15, 8635. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-91938-5

Demirbas, A.H., Demirbas, I, 2007

Importance of rural bioenergy for developing countries. Energy Convers. Manag. 48, 2386–2398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2007.03.005

P. Dinesha; S. Kumar and M.A. Rosen (2019). Biomass Briquettes as an Alternative Fuel: A Comprehensive Review 7. https://doi.org/10.1002/ente.201801011

L. Emami Taba; M.F. Irfan; W.A.M. Wan Daud and M.H. Chakrabarti (2012). The effect of temperature on various parameters in coal, biomass and CO-gasification: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 16, 5584–5596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.06.015

B.C. Falemara; V.I. Joshua; O.O. Aina and R.D. Nuhu (2018). Performance Evaluation of the Physical and Combustion Properties of Briquettes Produced from Agro-Wastes and Wood Residues. Recycling 3, 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling3030037

J. Fruhstorfer and C.G. Aneziris (2017). Influence of particle size distributions on the density and density gradients in uniaxial compacts. Ceram. Int. 43, 13175–13184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.07.011

G.A. Geberehiet; T.G. Gebreegziabher; A.G. Mekonen; G.K. Hagos and T.N. Gebresilasie (2025a). Development of briquettes suitable for energy generation from residue of sorghum stalk and groundnut husk. Mater. Renew. Sustain. Energy 14, 35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40243-025-00309-7

G.A. Geberehiet; T.G. Gebreegziabher; A.G. Mekonen; G.K. Hagos and T.N. Gebresilasie (2025b). Development of briquettes suitable for energy generation from residue of sorghum stalk and groundnut husk. Mater. Renew. Sustain. Energy 14, 35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40243-025-00309-7

A. Gendek; M. Aniszewska; J. Mala?ák and J. Velebil (2018). Evaluation of selected physical and mechanical properties of briquettes produced from cones of three coniferous tree species. Biomass Bioenergy 117, 173–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.07.025

J.E. Houghton; J. Behnsen; R.A. Duller; T.E. Nichols and R.H. Worden (2024). Particle size analysis: A comparison of laboratory-based techniques and their application to geoscience. Sediment. Geol. 464, 106607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sedgeo.2024.106607

B.M. Jenkins; L.L. Baxter; T.R. Miles and T.R. Miles (1998). Combustion properties of biomass. Fuel Process. Technol. 54, 17–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3820(97)00059-3

S. Kujawiak; M. Makowska; D. Janczak; W. Czeka?a; W. Krzesi?ski; A. Antonowicz and K. Kupryaniuk (2024). An Analysis of the Physicochemical and Energy Parameters of Briquettes Manufactured from Sewage Sludge Mixtures and Selected Organic Additives. Energies 17, 4573. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17184573

B. Lela; M. Bariši? and S. Nižeti? (2016). Cardboard/sawdust briquettes as biomass fuel: Physical–mechanical and thermal characteristics. Waste Manag., Refuse Derived Fuel/Solid Recovered Fuel 47, 236–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2015.10.035

Z. Liu; F. Zhang; H. Liu; F. Ba; S. Yan and J. Hu (2018). Pyrolysis/gasification of pine sawdust biomass briquettes under carbon dioxide atmosphere: Study on carbon dioxide reduction (utilization) and biochar briquettes physicochemical properties. Bioresour. Technol. 249, 983–991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.11.012

A.C. Marafon; A.F.C. Amaral; J.C. Machado; J. da C. Carneiro; A.N. Bierhals and V. dos S. Guimarães (2020).

Chemical composition and calorific value of elephant grass varieties and other feedstocks intended for direct combustion. Grassl. Sci. 2021, 241–297. https://doi.org/10.1111/grs.12311

U. Mark; V. Anyam and O. Sanni (2018). Phytochemical studies of Cissus populnea in Benue State, Nigeria. GSC Biol. Pharm. Sci. 2. https://doi.org/10.30574/gscbps.2018.2.1.0022

H.M.P. Marreiro; R.S. Peruchi; R.M.B.P. Lopes; S.L.F. Andersen; S.A. Eliziário and P. Rotella Junior (2021).. Empirical Studies on Biomass Briquette Production: A Literature Review. Energies 14, 8320. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14248320

S. Nonsawang; S. Juntahum; P. Sanchumpu; W. Suaili; K. Senawong and K. Laloon (2024). Unlocking renewable fuel: Charcoal briquettes production from agro-industrial waste with cassava industrial binders. Energy Rep. 12, 4966–4982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2024.10.053

O.F. Obi; R. Pecenka and M.J. Clifford (2022). A Review of Biomass Briquette Binders and Quality Parameters. Energies 15, 2426. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15072426

C. Ohagwu; J. Nwakaire; D. Amaefule; C. Anyanwu and C. Nwaezeh (2022). Physico-Mechanical and Fuel Properties of Sawdust Briquettes using Abelmoschus esculentus Waste as a Binder. Agric. Eng. Int. CIGR J. 24.

J.T. Oladeji (2015). Theoretical Aspects of Biomass Briquetting: A Review Study. J. Energy Technol. Policy 5, 72–81.

J.T. Oladeji (2012). Comparative Study of Briquetting of Few Selected Agro-Residues Commonly Found in Nigeria. Pac. J. Sci. Technol. 13, 80–86.

T.U. Onuegbu; U.E. Ekpunobi; I.M. Ogbu; M.O. Ekeoma and F.O. Obumselu (2011). COMPARATIVE STUDIES OF IGNITION TIME AND WATER BOILING TEST OF COAL AND BIOMASS BRIQUETTES BLEND.

J. Parikh; S.A. Channiwala and G.K. Ghosal (2005). A correlation for calculating HHV from proximate analysis of solid fuels. Fuel 84, 487–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2004.10.010

I. Quaicoe; G.A. Stephens; C.A. Benyarku and N.A. Lasidzi (2024). Assessment of Combustion Properties of Briquettes Produced from Three Different Biomasses Sourced from Tarkwa, Ghana. J. Energy Res. Rev. 16, 22–33. https://doi.org/10.9734/jenrr/2024/v16i2334

D.E. Rotimi; I.O. Evbuomwan; M.E. Iyobhebhe; T.D. Olaolu and O.A. Ojo (2023). Pharmacological activities of Cissus populnea in human diseases. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 50, 102719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2023.102719

A.A.H. Saeed; N. Yub Harun; M.R. Bilad; M.T. Afzal; A.M. Parvez; F.A.S. Roslan; S. Abdul Rahim; V.D. Vinayagam and H.K. Afolabi (2021). Moisture Content Impact on Properties of Briquette Produced from Rice Husk Waste. Sustainability 13, 3069. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063069

O.A. Sotannde; A.O. Oluyege and G.B. Abah (2010). Physical and combustion properties of briquettes from sawdust of Azadirachta indica. J. For. Res. 21, 63–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-010-0010-6

S. Yaman; M. Sahan?ahan; H. Haykiri-Açma; K. ?e?en and S. Küçükbayrak (2001). Fuel briquettes from biomass–lignite blends. Fuel Process. Technol. 72, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3820(01)00170-9

G. Zhang; Y. Sun and Y. Xu (2018). Review of briquette binders and briquetting mechanism. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 82, 477–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.072

Published

2026-03-31

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.