Experimental Investigation for Fault Diagnosis of a Single Stage Worm Gearbox Using Response Surface Methodology

Authors

  • Raghavendra Barshikar Research Scholar
  • Prasad R Baviskar Dr.

Keywords:

Production loss, Worm wheel, Bearing, Design of experiment, Response Surface Method., Design of experiment, Production loss, Response Surface Method, Worm wheel Bearing, Worm wheel

Abstract

Gearbox transmission system is a fundamental factor in the industrial applications. If gearbox stop working due to different faults, it may break normal machine operation and cause a production loss. This research paper focused on fault analysis of combination of worm wheel and bearing by using root mean square (RMS) and response surface method (RSM). Faults considered on outer race and inner race of worm wheel bearing, on worm wheel tooth. These faults and load were considered as an important independent factor to understand their effects on RMS response of worm gearbox. Worm gearbox experimental setup is for laboratory experimentation and RSM for analysis. Twenty seven experimental trial conducted for three level of parameters based on design of experiment (DOE). Vibration based response measured in frequency domain and root mean square parameter extracted for the fault analysis. Box behnken design RSM is implemented to investigate independent parameters effect on output parameter i.e RMS. The result shows that effect of faulty inner race bearing is more on worm wheel as compared to faulty outer race bearing and fault parameter influence RMS than load parameter.

Author Biography

Prasad R Baviskar, Dr.

Professor in mechanical deparment at Sandip Institute of Technology and Research Centre, Nashik

References

Ahmad, A.; M. U. Rehman; A. F. Wali; H. A. El-Serehy; F. A. Al-Misned; S. N. Maodaa; M. Aljawdah; T. M. Mir and P. Ahmad. (2020). Box–Behnken Response Surface Design of Polysaccharide Extraction from Rhododendron Arboreum and the Evaluation of Its Antioxidant Potential. Molecules 25: 3835. doi:10.3390/molecules25173835.

Ammar, D. M.; S. E. Oraby; M. A. Younes and S. E. Elsayed. (2022). Prediction of Bearing Service Life Using an Auto Regression Moving Average and Response Surface Methodology. Applications of Modelling and Simulation 6: 1-9. http://arqiipubl.com/ojs/index.php/AMS_Journal/article/view/324/128.

Attoui, I.; N. Fergani; N. Boutasseta; B. Oudjani and A. Deliou. (2017). A New Time–Frequency Method for Identification and Classification of Ball Bearing Faults. Journal of Sound and Vibration 397: 241-265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2017.02.041

Barad, M. (2014). Design of Experiments (DOE)—a Valuable Multi-Purpose Methodology. Applied Mathematics, 5: 2120-2129. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/am.2014.514206.

Behera, S. K.; H. Meena; S. Chakraborty and B.C. Meikap. (2018). Application of Response Surface Methodology (RSM) for Optimization of Leaching Parameters for Ash Reduction from Low-Grade Coal. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 28: 621-629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmst.2018.04.014.

Dhamande, L. S. and Chaudhari, M. B. (2018). Compound Gear-Bearing Fault Feature Extraction Using Statistical Features Based on Time-Frequency Method. Measurement 125: 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.04.059.

Durakovic, B. (2017). Design of Experiments Application, Concepts, Examples: State of the Art. Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Scinces, 5: 421-439. DOI: 10.21533/pen.v5i3.145.

Goyal, D.; Vanraj; B.S.Pabla and S. S. Dhami. (2019). Non-Contact Sensor Placement Strategy for Condition Monitoring of Rotating Machine-Elements. Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal, 22: 489-501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2018.12.006.

Jankovic, A.; G. Chaudhary and F. Goia. (2021). Designing the Design of Experiments (DOE) –an Investigation on The Influence of Different Factorial Designs on The Characterization of Complex Systems. Energy & Buildings 250: 111-298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111298.

Jun, Z.; and Fan, G. (2015). Statistical Modification Analysis of Helical Planetary Gears Based on Response Surface Method and Monte Carlo Simulation. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 28:1194–1203. DOI: 10.3901/CJME.2015.0610.079.

Kankar, P. K.; S. C Sharma and S. P. Harsha. (2011). Fault Diagnosis of High Speed Rolling Element Bearings Due to Localized Defects Using Response Surface Method, Measurement and Control 133: 031007. DOI: 10.1115/1.4003371.

Kankar, P. K.; S. P. Harsha; P. Kumar and S. C. Sharma. (2009). Fault Diagnosis of a Rotor Bearing System Using Response Surface Method. European Journal of Mechanics A/Solids, 28: 841–857. doi:10.1016/j.euromechsol.2009.03.004.

Karimifard, S. and Moghaddam, M. R. A. (2018). Application of Response Surface Methodology in Physicochemical Removal of Dyes from Wastewater: A Critical Review. Science of the Total Environment, 640-641: 772-797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.355.

Mishra, H. P. and. Jalan, A. (2021). Analysis of Faults in Rotor-Bearing System Using Three-Level Full Factorial Design and Response Surface Methodology. Noise & Vibration Worldwide 52: 1-12. DOI: 10.1177/09574565211030711.

Montgomery, D.C. (2017). Design and Analysis of Experiments. John Wiley & Sons Publisher.

Mukhopadhya, T.; T. K. Dey; R. Chowdhury and Chakrabarti. (2015). A Structural Damage Identification Using Response Surface-Based Multi-Objective Optimization: a Comparative Study. Arab J Sci Eng, 40: 1027–1044. DOI 10.1007/s13369-015-1591-3.

Patil, M. S.; J. Mathew and P. K. Rajendrakumar. (2010). Experimental Studies Using Response Surface Methodology for Condition Monitoring of Ball Bearings. Journal of Tribology, 132: 044505. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4002520.

Slimane, A.; S. Slimane; S. Kebdani; M. Chaib; S. Dahmane; B. Bouchouicha; N. Sardi and S. Adjim. (2018). Parameters Effects Analysis of Rotary Ultrasonic Machining on Carbon Fiber Reinforced Plastic (CFRP) Composite Using an Interactive RSM Method. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing, 13: 521–529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-018-0518-0.

Umutlu, R. C.; B. Hizarci; Z. Kiral and H. Ozturk. (2020). Classification of Pitting Fault Levels in a Worm Gearbox Using Vibration Visualization and ANN. Sadhana Academy Proceedings in Engineering Sciences 45: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-019-1263.

Vanraj; S.S. Dhami and B. S. Pabla. (2017). Optimization of Sound Sensor Placement for Condition Monitoring of Fixed-Axis Gearbox. Cogent Physics, 4: 1-19. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2017.1345673.

Waqar, T. and Demetgul, M. (2016). Thermal Analysis MLP Neural Network Based Fault Diagnosis on Worm Gears. Measurement 86: 56–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2016.02.024.

Published

2023-06-27