Discretization of Continuous Spaces using Barycentric Subdivision Method with Metric Space Constraints on the Nearest Neighbour Edges

Authors

  • Eliazar Elisha Audu Centre for Information and Telecommunication Engineering, University of PortHarcourt
  • Akaa Eteng University of Port Harcourt
  • Iyemeh Uchendu

Keywords:

Barycentric subdivision, Method of moment, Rao-Wilton-Glission, Basis function

Abstract

The Rao-Wilton-Glisson (RWG) is a commonly used basis function in the numerical solution of the electric field integral equation (EFIE) using the Method of Moments (MoM) and Galerkin approach. This method relies on triangular patches to approximate the surface current. Traditionally, barycentric subdivision of a primary triangle into n-sub-triangles has been used with RWG basis function to solve the EFIE using MoM. This paper presents a method of approximating a surface using triangular patches by sub-dividing a primary triangle into (2n-1) subtriangles. which creates a denser mesh than the widely used nine (9) points quadrature method. The structure is approximated by small square patches, which are further sub-divided into two primary triangles. By applying barycentric sub-division, the primary triangles are decomposed into sub-triangles to create a mesh over the surface of the structure. Using graph theory, the triangular meshes are defined by the function, G (V, E), where V and E are the vertices and edges of the triangles in the mesh space, respectively. The connectivity matrix of shared edges is found by imposing a constraint on the edge length using metric spaces. This method approximates a square patch with 32 scalene triangles and shows that it can be used to reconstruct equilateral patches and doubly split double ring into mesh structures

References

Akande, K. O.; T. O. Owolabi and S. Twaha. (2014) Performance Comparison of SVM and ANN in Predicting Compressive Strength of Concrete. IOSR Journal of Computer Engineering. Ver. I.

Cianferotti L.; C. Fossi and M. L. Brandi (2015) Hip Protectors: Are They Worth it? Calcified tissue international 97(1). United States: 1–11.

Cohen T. and Widdows D. (2013) Geometric Representations in Biomedical Informatics: Applications in Automated Text Analysis. In: Methods in Biomedical Informatics: A Pragmatic Approach. Elsevier Inc., pp. 99–139.

Haris A.; B. W. Y. Goh; T. E. Tay. (2018) On the effectiveness of incorporating shear thickening fluid with fumed silica particles in hip protectors. Smart Materials and Structures 27(1). IOP Publishing: 01–12.

Holzer L. A.; G. von Skrbensky and G. Holzer (2009) Mechanical testing of different hip protectors according to a European Standard. Injury 40(11): 1172–1175.

Kannus P.; J. Parkkari and J. Poutala (1999) Comparison of force attenuation properties of four different hip protectors under simulated falling conditions in the elderly: an in vitro biomechanical study. Bone 25(2): 229–235.

Malik M. H. and A. F. M. Arif (2013) ANN prediction model for composite plates against low velocity impact loads using finite element analysis. Composite Structures 101. Elsevier Ltd: 290–300.

Parandoush P. and D. Lin (2017) A review on additive manufacturing of polymer-fiber composites. Composite Structures.

Park J. H. and J. R. Lee (2019) Developing fall-impact protection pad with 3D mesh curved surface structure using 3D printing technology. Polymers 11(11).

Ren J. (2012) ANN vs. SVM: Which one performs better in classification of MCCs in mammogram imaging. Knowledge-Based Systems 26: 144–153.

Robinovitch S. N.; W. C. Hayes and T. A. McMahon (1995) Energy-Shunting Hip Padding System Attenuates Femoral Impact Force in a Simulated Fall. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 117(4): 409–413.

Roy K.; S. Kar and R. N. Das (2015) Selected Statistical Methods in QSAR. In: Understanding the Basics of QSAR for Applications in Pharmaceutical Sciences and Risk Assessment. Elsevier, pp. 191–229.

Salami B. A.; M. A. M. Johari; Z. A. Ahmad. (2019) Modelling the early strength of alkali-activated cement composites containing palm oil fuel ash. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Construction Materials 172(3): 133–143.

Sendel F.; D. Allison-Hope and J. Morris (2015) 3D Printing Sustainability Opportunities and Challenges. Bsr.

Üstün B.; W. J. Melssen and L. M. C. Buydens (2007) Visualisation and interpretation of Support Vector Regression models. Analytica Chimica Acta.

Van Der Ploeg T.; P. C. Austin and E. W. Steyerberg (2014) Modern modelling techniques are data hungry: A simulation study for predicting dichotomous endpoints. BMC Medical Research Methodology.

van Schoor N. M.; J. H. Smit and J. W. R. Twisk (2003) Prevention of Hip Fractures by External Hip Protectors. JAMA 289(15): 1957. DOI: 10.1001/jama.289.15.1957.

Vapnik V. N. (1995) The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4757-2440-0.

Yahaya S.; M. Ripin and M. I. Ridzwan (2020) Assessment of the force attenuation capability of 3D printed hip protector in simulated sideways fall. Materials Research Express. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/2053- 1591/abd2f7.

Zhang Q. and C. Wang (2008) Using genetic algorithm to optimize artificial neural network: A case study on earthquake prediction. In: Proceedings - 2nd International Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computing, WGEC 2008, 2008. DOI: 10.1109/WGEC.2008.96.

Downloads

Published

2024-09-29