Clustering by Partitioning around Medoids using Distance-Based Similarity Measures on Interval-Scaled Variables

Authors

  • Denis Lemongew Nkweteyim University of Buea

Keywords:

PAM, Euclidean, Manhattan, Angular distance, Silhouette

Abstract

It is reported in this paper, the results of a study of the partitioning around medoids (PAM) clustering algorithm applied to four datasets, both standardized and not, and of varying sizes and numbers of clusters. The angular distance proximity measure in addition to the two more traditional proximity measures, namely the Euclidean distance and Manhattan distance, was used to compute object-object similarity. The data used in the study comprise three widely available datasets, and one that was constructed from publicly available climate data. Results replicate some of the well known facts about the PAM algorithm, namely that the quality of the clusters generated tend to be much better for small datasets, that the silhouette value is a good, even if not perfect, guide for the optimal number of clusters to generate, and that human intervention is required to interpret generated clusters. Additionally, results also indicate that the angular distance measure, which traditionally has not been widely used in clustering, outperforms both the Euclidean and Manhattan distance metrics in certain situations.

References

Aldenderfer, M.S. and Blashfield, R.K. (1984). Cluster Analysis. Sage Publications, United States.
Bramer, M. (2013). Principles of Data Mining: Undergraduate Topics in Computer Science, Springer-Verlag, London.
Climate-data.org (n.d.). Climate: Cameroon. Available at: http://en.climate-data.org/country/142/. Accessed on July 30, 2016.
Han, J.; J. Pei and M. Kamber. (2006). Data Mining: Concepts and techniques, Southeast Asia Edition, 2nd edition. Morgan Kaufmann, Elsevier, Singapore.
Higuera, C., Gardiner, K., Cios, K. (2015). Self-Organizing Feature Maps Identify Proteins Critical to Learning in a Mouse Model of Down Syndrome. PLoS ONE 10(6): e0129126.
Koppen Climate Classification (N.D.). Koppen Climate Classification. Available at: https://www.britannica.com/science/Koppen-climate-classification. Accessed on 3 August, 2016.
Kruskal, J. and Wish, M. (1978). Multidimensional Scaling. Sage Publications, United States.
Linchman, M. (2013a). UCI Machine Learning Repository: Iris Data Set. University of California, School of Information and Computer Science, Irvine, CA.
Linchman, M. (2013b). UCI Machine Learning Repository: Leaf Data Set. University of California, School of Information and Computer Science, Irvine, CA.
Linchman, M. (2013c). UCI Machine Learning Repository: Mice Protein Expression Data Set. University of California, School of Information and Computer Science, Irvine, CA.
Silva, P.F.B.; A.R.S. Marçal and R.M.A. da Silva. (2013). Evaluation of Features for Leaf Discrimination, in: Kamel, M., Campilho, A. (Eds.), Image Analysis and Recognition: 10th International Conference, ICIAR 2013, Póvoa Do Varzim, Portugal, June 26-28, 2013. Proceedings. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 197–204.
The Köppen Climate Classification System (n.d.). The Koppen Climate Classification System. Available at: http://www.thesustainabilitycouncil.org/resources/the-koppen-climate-classification-system/. Accessed Aug 3, 2016.
Tversky, A. (1977). Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84: 327–352.
Yinghua, L.; M. Tinghuai, T. Meili, C. Jie, T. Yuan, A. Abdullah and A. Mznah. (2016). An Efficient and Scalable Density-based Clustering Algorithm for Datasets with Complex Structures. Neurocomputing, 171: 9-22.

Downloads

Published

2018-02-22

Issue

Section

Articles