Nonlinear Time History Analysis for Seismic Effects on Reinforced Concrete Building

Authors

  • A. Hasan Daffodil International University
  • K. I. M. Iqbal
  • S. Ahammed
  • A. Ghosh

Keywords:

Displacement, Ground motion, Plastic hinges, Story drift, Time history analysis

Abstract

A typical Reinforced Concrete (RC) building frame comprising of RC columns and connecting beams that participates in resisting the earthquake forces. Due to earthquake, reversal tension generates at both faces of a beam and column; and hence damage occur in the frame for the disability of tension carrying capacity of concrete. Therefore, the structural performance of RC building for seismic load has been analyzed by nonlinear time history analysis method for this study. A residential building located in Dhaka, Bangladesh subjected to various types of gravity load and seismic load was considered to analyze using ETABS software as per the guideline of BNBC (2020). According to the guideline of ATC 40 (1996), the seismic performances like maximum displacement and story drift for RC building were evaluated both at structural and element levels by applying El Centro (1940) ground motion at the base of the structure. Formation of plastic hinges is used as the basis to evaluate the local performance and story drift is used to evaluate the global performance. At first, the considered building was designed only for gravity load, and then for both gravity and seismic load according to BNBC (2020). Further studies have been performed on that building considering double height column at a story level. It was observed that the maximum displacement and story drift exceeds the allowable limit for all the considered cases if seismic load is applied on the structure.

References

Arturo, T.C.; C.A. Hector; L.A. Jose Luis and G.A. Gonzalo. (2008). Seismic Behavior of Code-Designed Medium Rise Special Moment-Resisting Frame RC Buildings in Soft Soils of Mexico City. Eng. Struct., 30 (12): 3681–3707.

ATC-40. (1996). Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Building. Applied Technology Council, California, USA.

Avramidis, I.; A. Athanatopoulou; K. Morfidis.; A. Sextos and A. Giaralis. (2011). Eurocode-Compliant Seismic Analysis and Design of R/C Buildings. Springer Publisher, Switzerland.

BNBC. (2020). Bangladesh National Building Code. Housing and Building Research Institute, Mirpur, Dhaka, Bangladesh:

Duggal, S. K. (2010). Earthquake Resistance Design of Structure. Oxford University Press, Fourth Edition ed., New Delhi.

Ghosh, A.; S. Ahammed; K. I. M. Iqbal and T. R. Hossain. (2019). Performance Evaluation of RC Buildings by Time History Analysis. Proceedings on International Conference on Disaster Risk Management, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Gkimprixis, A.; E. Tubaldi and J. Douglas. (2020). Evaluating Alternative Approaches for the Seismic Design of Structures. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering. 18: 4331–4361.

Gunn, A.M. (2007). Encyclopedia of Disasters: Environmental Catastrophes and Human Tragedies. Greenwood Publishing Group, Imperial Valley, California.

Haque, M.; S. Ray; A. Chakraborty; M. Elias and I. Alam. (2016). Seismic Performance Analysis of RCC Multi-Storied Buildings with Plan Irregularity. American Journal of Civil Engineering, 4 (3): 68-73.

Islam, A.B.M.S.; M. Jameel; M.A. Uddin and S.I. Ahmed. (2011). Simplified Design Guidelines for Seismic Base Isolation in Multi-Storey Buildings for Bangladesh National Building Code (BNBC). International Journal of the Physical Sciences, 6 (23): 5467-5486.

Jiang, Z. and Christenson, R. (2011). A comparison of 200 kN magneto-rheological damper models for use in real-time hybrid simulation pretesting. Smart Mater. Struct., 20: 01-11.

Kueht, E. and Hueste, M.B. (2009). Impact of code requirements in the central United States: Seismic performance assessment of a reinforced concrete building. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 135 (4): 404–413.

Mehanny, S.S.F. and EI Howary, H.A. (2010). Assessment of RC moment Frame Buildings in Moderate Seismic Zones: Evaluation of Egyptian Seismic Code Implications and System Configuration Effects. Eng. Struct., 32 (8): 2394–2406.

Mwafy, A. and Elnashai, A. (2001). Static Pushover Versus Dynamic Collapse Analysis of RC Buildings, Engineering Structures. 23 (5): 407-424.

Panagiotakos, T.B. and Fardis, M.N. (2004). Seismic Performance of RC Frames Designed to Eurocode 8 or Greek Code 2000. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2 (2): 221–259.

Patil, A.S. and Kumbhar, P.D. (2013). Time History Analysis of Multistoried RCC Buildings for Different Seismic Intensities. Int. J. Struct. & Civil Engg, 2 (3): 194-201.

Rahman, M.M.; S.M. Jadhav and B.M. Shahrooz. (2018). Seismic Performance of Reinforce Concrete Buildings Designed according to Codes in Bangladesh. India and U.S, Engineering Structures, 160: 111–120.

Romy, M. and Prabha, C. (2011). Dynamic Analysis of RCC Buildings with Shear Wall. International Journal of Earth Sciences and Engineering, 4: 659-662.

Sadjadi, R.; M.R. Kianoush and S. Talebi. (2007). Seismic Performance of Reinforced Concrete Moment Resisting Frames. Eng Struct, 29 (9): 2365–2380.

Siswanto, A.B. and Salim, M. A. (2018). Basic Criteria Design of Earthquake Resistant Building Structures. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 9 (4): 1426–1436.

Vanshaj, K. and Narayan, K. (2017). Seismic Response of Multistory Flat Slab Building with and without Shear Wall, International Research Journal of Engineering & Technology. 4 (11): 573-578.

Wilkinson, S. and Hiley, R. (2006). A Non-linear Response History Model for the Seismic Analysis of High-Rise Framed Buildings. Computers and Structures, 84: 318-329.

Wu, X. (2014). A Study of Nonlinear Time History Analysis vs. Current Codes Analysis Procedure of Comparing Linear Dynamic Demand with Nonlinear Static Capacity for Ordinary Standard Bridge. 10th Asia Pacific Transportation Development Conference, Beijing, China.

Published

2022-12-31

Issue

Section

Articles