Investigation of Interlock Geometry Sizes Effect on the Shear Capacity of Dry-Joint Interlocking Core Block Masonry

Authors

  • K. Abdoulaye Pan African University Institute for Basic Sciences, Technology and Innovation, hosted at the Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Nairobi, Kenya
  • D. O. Koteng School of Civil and Resource Engineering, Technical University of Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya
  • N. Gathimba Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Kenya
  • R. N. Mutuku Department of Building and Civil Engineering, Technical University of Mombasa, Kenya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63746/njtd.v23i1.4515

Keywords:

Core interlocking block, Interlock depth and thickness, Dry-stacked joint, Compressed soil block, Shear behavior, Finite element analysis

Abstract

Interlocking compressed earth block structure is a dry-stacked system that relies on geometric interlocking rather than mortar. The shear behavior of these structures is linked to the interlock geometry, especially the thickness and depth of the interlocking mechanism. This study examines the in-plane shear behavior of dry-stacked interlocking core block using a finite element triplet shear simulation model in Abaqus, focusing on how interlock thickness and depth influence shear strength, peak displacement, and failure modes. An experimental test was performed with the optimum interlock sizes obtained from the numerical simulation. The results indicate that the shear strength increases with interlock thickness but drops beyond 35mm (11.6% of the block length) due to a significant reduction in the residual soil interface on the female (depression) part. The findings also reveal that changes in interlock thickness have a greater effect on both strength and deformation capacity than changes in interlock depth. Shear strength ranges from 0.08 to 0.25 MPa, representing a 3.1-fold improvement (210% increase) from the thicknesses of 5mm to 35mm (2%-11.6% of the block length). In a similar range of depth, shear strength varies from 0.24 to 0.36 MPa, a 1.5-fold (50% increase) increase. These findings indicate the important role of interlock geometry in the shear performance of dry-stacked joints. The failure mode was characterized by early crushing of the interlock protrusions at thinner thicknesses, whereas at thicker thicknesses, both the interlock protrusions and the residual soil interface on the female face sustained significant damage. These findings emphasize the potential of core interlocking masonry in regions vulnerable to wind and seismic activity

References

Abdullah, A. H., Nagapan, S., Antonyova, A., Rasiah, K., Yunus, R., & Sohu, S. (2017). Strength and Absorption Rate of Compressed Stabilized Earth Bricks (CSEBs) Due to Different Mixture Ratios and Degree of Compaction. MATEC Web of Conferences, 103, 01028. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201710301028

Ahmad, K. (2001). Global population will increase to nine billion by 2050, says UN report. The Lancet, 357(9259), 864. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)71800-6

Ali, O., Abbas, A., Khalil, E., & Madkour, H. (2021). Numerical investigation of FRP-confined short square RC columns. Construction and Building Materials, 275, 122141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.122141

Anand, K. B., & Ramamurthy, K. (2005). Development and Evaluation of Hollow Concrete Interlocking Block Masonry System. The Masonry Society Journal, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.70803/001c.130934

Baneshi, V., Dehghan, S. M., & Hassanli, R. (2023). An experimental study on the behavior of interlocking masonry blocks manufactured using 3D printed mold. Advances in Structural Engineering, 26(2), 360–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/13694332221126595

Bland, D. W. (2011). In-plane cyclic shear performance of interlocking compressed earth block walls. Thesis, Faculty of California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo.

Bosiljkov, V., A. W. Page, V. Bokan-Bosiljkov, & R. Zarnic. (2003). Performance Based Studies of in-Plane Loaded Unreinforced Masonry. Masonry International, 16, 39–50.

Modena, C., Da Porto, F., & Valluzzi, M. R. (2016). Brick and block masonry: Proceedings of the 16th international brick and block masonry conference, padova, italy, 26-30 june 2016. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/b21889

British Standard Institution. (2002). BS EN 1052-3. Methods of test for masonry-Part, 3.

Casapulla, C., Mousavian, E., Argiento, L., Ceraldi, C., & Bagi, K. (2021). Torsion-shear behaviour at the interfaces of rigid interlocking blocks in masonry assemblages: experimental investigation and analytical approaches. Materials and Structures, 54(3), 134. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-021-01721-x

Crespi, P., Sturm, T., Formisano, A., De, J., & Ortúzar, D. (2016). Experimental and numerical study of partially grouted reinforced masonry shear walls subjected to in-plane loading Sebastián Andrés Calderón Díaz.

Diao, Y., Yan, Y., Zheng, G., Wang, Z., Yu, H., & Huang, J. (2024). Mechanical properties and damage plastic model for cement-soil mortar: Laboratory tests and numerical analysis. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 21, e03957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e03957

Dinesh, R. G., & Rahman, S. S. A. (2022). Analytical investigation on interlocking brick masonry with RC frame. International Journal of Health Sciences, 5929–5939. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS5.10004

Dorji, S., Derakhshan, H., Thambiratnam, D. P., & Mohyeddin, A. (2024). Lateral load response of semi-interlocking mortarless masonry-infilled frames. Structures, 61, 105998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2024.105998

Elmalyh, S., Bouyahyaoui, A., Cherradi, T., Rotaru, A., & Mihai, P. (2020). In-Plane Shear Behavior of Unreinforced Masonry Walls Strengthened with Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composites. Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, 5(2), 360–367. https://doi.org/10.25046/aj050247

Furukawa, A., Prasetyo, J. J., & Kiyono, J. (2019). Failure process and load-displace-ment relationship of rectangular block and interlocking block walls during in-plane lateral loading Failure process and load-displacement relationship of rectangular block and interlocking block walls during in-plane lateral loading. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24762/jndsj.38.S06_25

Gul, A., Alam, B., & Shahzada, K. (2022). Seismic performance evaluation of unconfined dry stacked block masonry structure. Engineering Structures, 265, 114529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114529

Han, L. C., Bin Mirasa, A. K., Saad, I., Bt. Bolong, N., Bt. Asman, N. S. A., Bte Asrah, H., & Bin Abdullah, E. S. R. (2020). Use of Compressed Earth Bricks/Blocks in Load-Bearing Masonry Structural Systems: A Review. Materials Science Forum, 997, 9–19. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.997.9

Hou, Y., Liu, D., Qi, D., Liu, S., Wang, T., & Zhang, J. (2025). Shear Behavior of Large Keyed Dry Joints in Segmental Precast Bridges: Experiment, Numerical Modeling, and Capacity Prediction. Buildings, 15(18), 3375. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15183375

Jia, L., & Zhang, D. (2024). Numerical simulation research on the influence of interlocking depth and block number on the compressive performance of interlocking block masonry. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2024-1499

Kasinikota, P., & Tripura, D. D. (2024). Shear capacity of interlocking compressed stabilized earth block masonry panels. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2024.2372611

Khan, I., Gul, A., Shahzada, K., Khan, N. A., Rehman, F. U., Samiullah, Q., & Khattak, M. A. (2021). Computational Seismic Analysis of Dry-Stack Block Masonry Wall. Civil Engineering Journal, 7(3), 488–501. https://doi.org/10.28991/cej-2021-03091668

Koudje, B., & Adjovi, E. (2025). Numerical Simulation of a Shear Wall Model in Interlocking Masonry with Dry Vertical and Horizontal Joints in Compressed Earth Blocks. Buildings, 15(4), 627. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15040627

Krajcinovic, D., & Fonseka, G. U. (1981). The Continuous Damage Theory of Brittle Materials, Part 1: General Theory. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 48(4), 809–815. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3157739

Lubliner, J., Oliver, J., Oller, S., & Oñate, E. (1989). A plastic-damage model for concrete. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 25(3), 299–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7683(89)90050-4

Nadeem, M., Gul, A., Bahrami, A., Azab, M., Khan, S. W., & Shahzada, K. (2023). Evaluation of mechanical properties of cored interlocking blocks – A step toward affordable masonry material. Results in Engineering, 18, 101128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2023.101128

Peng, C. (2016). Calculation of a building’s life cycle carbon emissions based on Ecotect and building information modeling. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 453–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.078

Rainone, L. S., Tateo, V., Casolo, S., & Uva, G. (2023). About the Use of Concrete Damage Plasticity for Modeling Masonry Post-Elastic Behavior. Buildings, 13(8), 1915. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13081915

Rankawat, N., Brzev, S., Jain, S. K., & Pérez Gavilán, J. J. (2021). Nonlinear seismic evaluation of confined masonry structures using equivalent truss model. Engineering Structures, 248, 113114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113114

Saari, S., Bakar, B. H. A., & Surip, N. A. (2017). Strength properties of interlocking compressed earth brick units. 020017. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5005648

Sean Anthony Pringle. (2016). Diagonal Tension Testing of Interlocking Compressed Earth Block Panels. Master Thesis, Faculty of California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo.

Shehu Waziri, B., Alhaji Lawan, Z., & Mala, Aji. (2013). Properties of Compressed Stabilized Earth Blocks (CSEB) For Low-Cost Housing Construction: A Preliminary Investigation. In International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering & Technology (Vol. 4, Number 2). http://penerbit.uthm.edu.my/ojs/index.php/IJSCET

Shi, T., Zhang, X., Hao, H., & Chen, C. (2021). Experimental and numerical investigation on the compressive properties of interlocking blocks. Engineering Structures, 228, 111561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111561

Sturm, T., Ramos, L. F., & Lourenço, P. B. (2015). Characterization of dry-stack interlocking compressed earth blocks. Materials and Structures, 48(9), 3059–3074. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-014-0379-3

Totoev, Y., & Al Harthy, A. (2016). Semi Interlocking Masonry as Infill Wall System for Earthquake Resistant Buildings: A Review. The Journal of Engineering Research, 15(2), 33. https://doi.org/10.24200/tjer.vol13iss1pp33-41

Toutanji, H. (1999). Stress-Strain Characteristics of Concrete Columns Externally Confined with Advanced Fiber Composite Sheets. ACI Materials Journal, 96(3), 397–404. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14359/639

Uzoegbo, H. C. (2001). Lateral Loading Tests on Dry-Stack Interlocking Block Walls. In Structural Engineering, Mechanics and Computation (pp. 427–436). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008043948-8/50044-8

Walker, P. J. (1995). Strength, durability and shrinkage characteristics of cement stabilised soil blocks. Cement and Concrete Composites, 17(4), 301–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/0958-9465(95)00019-9

Weizmann, M., Amir, O., & Grobman, Y. J. (2021). The effect of block geometry on structural behavior of topological interlocking assemblies. Automation in Construction, 128, 103717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103717

Wosatko, A., Winnicki, A., Polak, M. A., & Pamin, J. (2019). Role of dilatancy angle in plasticity-based models of concrete. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 19(4), 1268–1283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acme.2019.07.003

Yousaf, S. M., Gul, A., Shahzada, K., & Khan, S. W. (2024). Evaluation of lateral strength capacity of cored interlocking block masonry piers under variable pre-compression loads. Structures, 70, 107640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2024.107640

Yu, F., Jiang, Q., Chong, X., Zhang, L., Huang, J., & Feng, Y. (2025). Investigation of the shear performance of multi-key block bonding surfaces without connecting reinforcement for precast elements. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 40274. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-24057-w

Published

2026-03-31