A A Segmentation-Based Hybrid Chain Ladder–XGBoost Framework for Incurred But Not Reported Claims Estimation

Authors

  • N. M. Ajang Pan African University Institute for Basic Sciences, Technology and Innovation (PAUSTI), hosted by Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology (JKUAT), Kenya
  • O. Ngesa Taita Taveta University, Kenya
  • J. Aduda Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology (JKUAT), kenya.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63746/njtd.v23i1.4437

Keywords:

Chain Ladder, Hybrid Actuarial Model, IBNR, Insurance Reserving, Machine Learning, XGBoost

Abstract

Accurate estimation of Incurred But Not Reported (IBNR) claims is critical in non-life insurance, particularly for portfolios characterized by heterogeneous claim sizes and nonlinear development patterns. Existing hybrid reserving models improve predictive accuracy but typically apply multiple models uniformly to the same claim population, implicitly assuming homogeneous claim behavior. Under heterogeneous portfolios, large and volatile claims can simultaneously distort Chain Ladder development factors and destabilize machine-learning training. This study addresses this limitation by proposing a segmentation-based hybrid Chain Ladder (CL)–XGBoost framework that models claim according to their volatility characteristics rather than treating all claims identically. Claims are partitioned into small and large segments using a data-driven 65th percentile threshold (claim amount €32.49). The threshold is selected through sensitivity analysis by minimizing validation-set Mean Absolute Error (MAE) prior to test evaluation, ensuring that it is not arbitrary or tuned to the test data. Small claims, which exhibit stable development patterns, are modeled using the classical CL method, whereas large high-variance claims are modeled using XGBoost, and segment-level predictions are aggregated to obtain cumulative IBNR estimates. Using motor insurance claims data from 2015–2019, the proposed framework demonstrates substantial improvements over benchmark models. Compared with the classical CL baseline (MAE €1,774.51), the hybrid model reduces MAE to €819.28 (54% reduction), RMSE from €2,026.08 to €819.39 (60% reduction), and MAPE from 0.92% to 0.60%, relative to an average claim size of approximately €387. Bootstrap resampling confirms that the reductions are statistically significant at the 5% level. The proposed model also outperforms standalone XGBoost, Uniform Hybrid and Neural-Network–CL hybrid across all evaluation metrics. The results show that performance gains arise primarily from heterogeneity-aware segmentation rather than hybridization alone. The framework therefore, provides a robust and interpretable reserving approach that stabilizes development estimation for small claims while allowing flexible nonlinear learning for large claims

References

Antonio, K. and Plat, R. (2021). Statistical learning applied to claims reserving. Risks, 9(2), 28.

Avanzi, B., Li, Y., Wong, B. and Xian, A. (2023). Modern machine learning approaches to insurance reserving. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 110, 1–17.

Avanzi, B., Li, Y., Wong, B. and Xian, A. (2024). Ensemble distributional forecasting for insurance claims. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 114, 52–70.

Blier-Wong, C., Cossette, H. and Marceau, E. (2020). Machine learning in actuarial science: A review of applications in claims reserving. Risks, 8(4), 117.

Bücher, A. and Rosenstock, M. (2023). Neural networks for loss reserving. European Actuarial Journal, 13, 245–272.

Chen, T. and Guestrin, C. (2016). XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 785–794.

Dong, Y. and Quan, Z. (2025). Interpretability and risk assessment of machine learning reserving models. Annals of Actuarial Science, 19(1), 1–25.

Feng, R. and Li, Y. (2023). Robust chain ladder methods for loss reserving with extreme claims. ASTIN Bulletin, 53(2), 421–447.

Henckaerts, R., Antonio, K., Verbelen, R. and Dhaene, J. (2021). A review of loss reserving methods. European Actuarial Journal, 11, 1–34.

Hiabu, M. and Müller, M. (2021). Micro-level reserving and machine learning in non-life insurance. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 97, 114–129.

Hiabu, M., Nielsen, J. and Verrall, R. (2023). Machine learning and insurance reserving: Opportunities and challenges. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 2023(5), 395–418.

Krisdiantha, S., Purwono, R. and Sari, N. (2023). Chain ladder reserving under heterogeneous portfolios. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 16(3), 145.

Kuo, K. (2019). DeepTriangle: A deep learning approach to loss reserving. Risks, 7(3), 97.

Laub, P., Taimre, T. and Pollett, P. (2025). Bias-variance trade-off in machine learning actuarial models. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 120, 65–82.

Mahohoho, T., Thupeng, W. and Sigauke, C. (2023). Artificial intelligence in actuarial reserving. Risks, 11(6), 110.

Manathunga, C. and Zhu, X. (2022). Machine learning performance stability in insurance data. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 410, 114208.

Mazzi, L., Savelli, N. and Clemente, G. (2024). Heterogeneity in insurance loss development. ASTIN Bulletin, 54(1), 101–128.

Poufinas, T., Galanos, G. and Papadopoulos, A. (2023). Predictive analytics in insurance risk management. Journal of Risk Finance, 24(2), 180–198.

Rahul, A. (2020). Gradient boosting techniques for claims reserving. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 13(11), 275.

Saida, A., Rahman, M. and Karim, S. (2023). Cluster-based segmentation for insurance reserving. Journal of Insurance and Financial Management, 6(2), 45–60.

Saoudi, A., Benali, M. and Boussaada, I. (2023). Evaluation of classical reserving models in non-life insurance. Journal of Applied Statistics, 50(7), 1405–1422.

Song, J. and Heo, J. (2022). Predictive modelling of claim severity using machine learning. Expert Systems with Applications, 197, 116641.

Suwardi, A. and Purwono, R. (2021). Improved chain ladder reserving methods under outlier conditions. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1725, 012045.

Wüthrich, M. (2018). Neural network embedding of the chain ladder method. European Actuarial Journal, 8(2), 409–431.

England, P. D., and Verrall, R. J. (2002). Stochastic claims reserving in general insurance. British Actuarial Journal, 8(3), 443–544.

Wüthrich, M. V., and Merz, M. (2008). Stochastic Claims Reserving Methods in Insurance. Wiley.

Published

2026-03-31

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.