Analysis of Consequences for Reactor Accident Under Vapours Cloud Explosion Scenario Based on Release Rate Changes

Authors

  • S. A. Ramli Industrial Process Reliability and Sustainability (INPRES), Faculty of Chemical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA,Shah Alam, Selangor, 40450, Malaysia.
  • M. A. Ahmad Industrial Process Reliability and Sustainability (INPRES), Faculty of Chemical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA,Shah Alam, Selangor, 40450, Malaysia.
  • Z. A. Rashid Industrial Process Reliability and Sustainability (INPRES), Faculty of Chemical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA,Shah Alam, Selangor, 40450, Malaysia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63746/njtd.v22i4.2932

Keywords:

ALOHA, MARPLOT, Reactor Accidents, Release Rate, Vapor Cloud Explosion

Abstract

This study investigates the consequences of vapor cloud explosions in chemical reactors, focusing on the impact of varying leak sizes (2, 5, 25, 100, and 150 mm) on chemical release rates. These release rates, influenced by the hole diameter, play a critical role in determining the extent of the vapor cloud's dispersion and the resulting consequences on human safety, infrastructure, and the environment. The primary objective of this research is to quantify how variations in release rates affect the severity of the explosion's impact over time, particularly with respect to the affected area and distance. The study employs ALOHA and MARPLOT simulation tools to model explosion scenarios at three chemical plants: IQOXE (Tarragona, Spain), Phillips Houston Chemical Complex (Texas, USA), and Formosa Plastics Corp (Texas, USA). At IQOXE, a 150 mm hole resulted in the largest release rate (317 kg/s), leading to a threat zone of 136,256 m² and a hazardous distance extending up to 393 meters, thus posing significant risks to neighbouring facilities. At the Phillips Houston Chemical Complex, a 17 kg/s ethylene release from a 150 mm hole affected the surrounding areas within a 288 m radius, whereas smaller leaks failed to trigger explosions due to lower release rates. Similarly, at Formosa Plastics, leaks from 100 mm and 150 mm vinyl chloride sources produced comparable impact areas, confined largely to the plant's immediate vicinity. Smaller leaks had minimal effects, highlighting the non-linear relationship between leak size and explosion consequences. The findings underscore the critical importance of understanding release rate dynamics for improving safety protocols and mitigating the risks associated with vapor cloud explosions in industrial settings.

References

Adinoyi, Y. (2014). Case studies in catastrophic industrial accidents: Lessons learned from historical disasters. Journal of Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 92(4), pp.365–373.

Atkinson, A., Smith, R. & Taylor, D. (2017). Vapor cloud explosions in chemical industries: Impact analysis and preventive strategies. Industrial Safety Review, 35(3), pp.45–58.

Bethea, A. (1992). Analysis of the Phillips Houston Chemical Complex explosion. Journal of Chemical Safety, 19(2), pp.89–95.

Brian, D.J., Miller, S.P., and Ridgebury, J., 2012. Vapor pressure dynamics in chemical reactions. Chemical Engineering Journal, 210, pp.45-56.

Cedre, 2004. Hazards of vinyl chloride: A comprehensive review. Technical Report. [Online] Available at: www.cedre.fr (Accessed 29 Nov. 2024).

Changphuek, C., Nguyen, T. & Ramirez, L. (2024). Advanced tools for chemical hazard simulation: Evaluating ALOHA and MARPLOT applications. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 430, 128496.

Ding, J., Liu, S., and Li, Y., 2018. Chemical dispersion modeling for industrial explosions. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 117, pp.256-269.

Ebel, P., Maris, P. & Gonzalez, F. (2020). Hazard assessment at the IQOXE plant: Lessons learned from recent incidents. Process Safety Progress, 39(4), pp.546–558.

Farrow, T., Yilmaz, K., and Zhang, W. (2016). Chemical hazards and vapor cloud dispersion models. Process Safety Progress, 35(3), pp.189-197.

Galeev, R., Ivanov, A. & Petrova, M. (2020). Assessing explosion risks in petrochemical plants: A review of flammable vapor hazards. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 65, 104113.

Gao, Y., Xu, W. & Zhang, T. (2019). Linking release rates with hazardous zone dynamics: A framework for VCE risk assessment. Safety Science, 116, pp.238–247.

Huang, C., Lin, H. & Wang, Z. (2023). CFD modeling of vapor cloud explosions: Case studies from the Amuay Refinery and Jaipur Plant. Journal of Computational Physics, 476, 111874.

Jones, A., Smith, B. & Taylor, C. (2013). Development of the Baker-Strehlow-Tang (BST) model for vapor cloud explosion simulations. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 26(4), pp.569–576.

Khakzad, N., Khan, F. & Amyotte, P. (2016). Risk-based design of process plants: A consequence analysis of vapor cloud explosions. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 104, pp.168–177.

Khan, F., Ahmed, S. & Rafiq, M. (2020). Bayesian inference techniques for explosion risk management in chemical industries. Journal of Risk Analysis and Management, 9(2), pp.89–104.

Leung, Y., Fang, S. & Lu, T. (2021). Role of chemical release rates in vapor cloud formation and explosion severity. Chemical Engineering Science, 229, 116014.

Li, Y., Chen, X. & Zhou, J. (2021). Factors influencing the severity of vapor cloud explosions in industrial settings. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 69, 104361.

Liu, X., Chang, Y., and Zhao, R. (2020). Explosion limits and modeling of hazardous chemicals. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 384, p.121405.

Marzouk, S., El-Ghazaly, H. & Salem, M. (2022). Hazard analysis of high-rate chemical releases: Implications for industrial safety. Process Safety Progress, 41(3), e12225.

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) (2019). ALOHA user’s manual: Hazard prediction for chemical releases. Silver Spring, MD: NOAA Office of Response and Restoration.

Neyraval, S., Toure, M. & Tisserand, C. (2022). Risk assessment in the ethylene oxide production process. Chemical Engineering Science, 256, 117703.

Nolan, D.P. (2019). Handbook of Fire and Explosion Protection Engineering Principles for Oil, Gas, Chemical, and Related Facilities. 3rd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Oran, E.S., Gamezo, V.N., and Zhao, R. (2020). Flammable vapor behavior in industrial settings. Combustion and Flame, 220, pp.112-119.

Peterson, G., Andrews, P. & Choi, K. (2019). Environmental parameters influencing the dispersion of hazardous chemical vapors. Atmospheric Environment, 210, pp.122–134.

Pierorazio, A.J., Thomas, J.K., Baker, W.E. & Tang, M.J. (2005). Multi-energy method for predicting vapor cloud explosion overpressures. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 120(1–3), pp.81–92.

Pouyakian, S., Habibi, R. & Mokhtari, A. (2023). Limitations of ALOHA modeling in predicting real-world chemical dispersions. Environmental Science and Technology Letters, 10(2), pp.34–40.

Salzano, E. (2023). Dynamics of vapor cloud explosions: From ignition to overpressure. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 95, pp.57–62.

Savage, G.M., Ogle, R.A. & Gibson, N. (1973). Vapor cloud explosions: Early studies on dispersion and combustion. AIChE Journal, 19(3), pp.472–479.

Sharma, V. (2020). The physics of deflagration and detonation in chemical process explosions. International Journal of Chemical Safety, 45(2), pp.113–121.

Sun, J., Yu, T., Zhao, L., and Changphuek, K. (2024). Comprehensive studies on gas dispersion dynamics. Safety Science, 140, p.105112.

U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (CSB) (2007). Investigation report: Formosa Plastics Corporation explosion. Washington, DC: CSB.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2016). ALOHA user guide: Area and distance assessment for chemical releases. Washington, DC: EPA Office of Emergency Management.

Vardhan, R. & Kalani, P. (2021). Enhancing accuracy in VCE risk analysis through computational fluid dynamics. Journal of Process Systems Engineering, 15(1), pp.23–39.

Yang, Q., Zhou, L. & Wu, X. (2021). Integration of CFD and machine learning for real-time explosion risk prediction. AI Applications in Chemical Safety Engineering, 8(3), pp.67–79.

Yates, D. (1999). Layout design and safety improvements at the Phillips Chemical Complex. Journal of Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 77(3), pp.152–161.

Zhao, J., Sun, M. & Zhang, R. (2020). Environmental factors in vapor dispersion modeling: Advances in computational methods. Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry, 77(5), pp.489–506.

Zhang, L., Fang, X. & Chen, R. (2020). Vapor cloud explosion risk management: A review of key factors. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 387, 121234.

Zhang, X., Lin, C. & Huang, Y. (2020). Integration of CFD models with empirical approaches for predicting vapor cloud explosion impacts. Safety Science, 127, 104686.

Zhang, X., Lin, Y., and Zhao, F. (2021). Relationships between release rates and explosion risks in chemical processes. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 73, p.104776.

Published

2025-09-29